Dialogue coherence: A generation framework [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Logic, Language and Information 16 (4):365-385 (2007)
This paper presents a framework for the generation of coherent elementary conversational sequences at the speech act level. We will embrace the notion of a cooperative dialogue game in which two players produce speech acts to transfer relevant information with respect to their commitments. Central to the approach is that participants try to achieve some sort of balanced cognitive state as a result of speech act generation and interpretation. Cognitive states of the participants change as a result of the interpretation of speech acts and these changes provoke the production of a subsequent speech act. Describing the properties and the dynamics of the mental constructs that constitute the participants’ cognitive states, such as beliefs and commitments, in relation to the various dialogue contributions is an essential aspect of the game. Although simple in its basic form, the framework enables us to produce abstract conversations with some properties that agree strikingly with coherence structures found in, for instance, Conversation Analysis.
|Keywords||Cooperative dialogue games Speech act generation Cognitive state update Cognitive balance Commitments Beliefs|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Rodger Kibble (2007). Generating Coherence Relations Via Internal Argumentation. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 16 (4):387-402.
Douglas Walton (2006). How to Make and Defend a Proposal in a Deliberation Dialogue. Artificial Intelligence and Law 14 (3):177-239.
Paul J. M. Jorion (1999). Thought as Word Dynamics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (2):295-295.
Paul Piwek (2007). Meaning and Dialogue Coherence: A Proof-Theoretic Investigation. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 16 (4):403-421.
Ruth Manor (1984). Dialogue Representation. Topoi 3 (1):63-73.
Douglas Walton (2011). A Dialogue System Specification for Explanation. Synthese 182 (3):349-374.
Stefanov Gheorghe (2010). Negative Acts. Analele Universitatii Bucuresti - Filosofie (LIX):3-9.
Robert Stalnaker (1998). On the Representation of Context. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 7 (1):3-19.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads3 ( #292,904 of 1,101,119 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #290,452 of 1,101,119 )
How can I increase my downloads?