Journal of the Philosophy of History 2 (3):263-275 (2008)
|Abstract||This paper offers a theory of genealogy, explaining its rise in the nineteenth century, its epistemic commitments, its nature as critique, and its place in the work of Nietzsche and Foucault. The crux of the theory is recognition of genealogy as an expression of a radical historicism, rejecting both appeals to transcendental truths and principles of unity or progress in history, and embracing nominalism, contingency, and contestability. In this view, genealogies are committed to the truth of radical historicism and, perhaps more provisionally, the truth of their own empirical content. Similarly, genealogies operate as denaturalizing critiques of ideas and practices that hide the contingency of human life behind formal ahistorical or developmental perspectives.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Devin Zane Shaw (2006). The Absence of Evidence is Not the Evidence of Absence. Radical Philosophy Today 2006:123-138.
Simon May (ed.) (2011). Nietzsche's on the Genealogy of Morality: A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press.
Jacqueline Stevens (2003). On the Morals of Genealogy. Political Theory 31 (4):558-588.
Fred Evans (2001). Genealogy and the Problem of Affirmation in Nietzsche, Foucault and Bakhtin. Philosophy and Social Criticism 27 (3):41-65.
Martin Saar (2008). Understanding Genealogy: History, Power, and the Self. Journal of the Philosophy of History 2 (3):295-314.
Lawrence J. Hatab (2008). Nietzsche's on the Genealogy of Morality: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press.
Tyler Krupp (2008). Genealogy as Critique? Journal of the Philosophy of History 2 (3):315-337.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads136 ( #3,195 of 549,128 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,128 )
How can I increase my downloads?