Impact of Ethical Leadership and Leader–Member Exchange on Whistle Blowing: The Moderating Impact of the Moral Intensity of the Issue
Journal of Business Ethics 103 (3):485-496 (2011)
|Abstract||Given the prevalence of corporate frauds and the significance of whistle blowing as a mechanism to report about the frauds, the present study explores the impact of ethical leadership and leader–member exchange (LMX) on whistle blowing. Additionally, the article also explores the moderating role of the moral intensity [studied as magnitude of consequences (MOC)] of the issue on this relationship. The article reports results of three experimental studies conducted on the postgraduate students of a premier technology institute in India. Ethical leadership, LMX, and moral intensity are manipulated through scenarios. Study one ( n = 81) manipulates ethical leadership (ethical/unethical) and quality of LMX (low and high) as independent variables; study two ( n = 80) manipulates ethical leadership and moral intensity (high and low MOC), and study three ( n = 87) manipulates LMX and MOCs to assess their individual and joint effects on whistle blowing. Results show that not only do ethical leadership and LMX predict whistle blowing, but these relationships get moderated by the moral intensity of the issue as well.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Ming Singer, Sarah Mitchell & Julie Turner (1998). Consideration of Moral Intensity in Ethicality Judgements: Its Relationship with Whistle-Blowing and Need-for-Cognition. Journal of Business Ethics 17 (5):73-87.
Gary R. Rothwell & J. Norman Baldwin (2007). Ethical Climate Theory, Whistle-Blowing, and the Code of Silence in Police Agencies in the State of Georgia. Journal of Business Ethics 70 (4):341 - 361.
Brianna B. Caza (2009). Making Sense of Whistle-Blowing's Antecedents. Business Ethics Quarterly 19 (4):553-586.
Barbara Arel, Cathy A. Beaudoin & Anna M. Cianci (2012). The Impact of Ethical Leadership, the Internal Audit Function, and Moral Intensity on a Financial Reporting Decision. Journal of Business Ethics 109 (3):351-366.
Joan Marie McMahon & Robert J. Harvey (2007). The Effect of Moral Intensity on Ethical Judgment. Journal of Business Ethics 72 (4):335 - 357.
Richard P. Nielsen (2013). Whistle-Blowing Methods for Navigating Within and Helping Reform Regulatory Institutions. Journal of Business Ethics 112 (3):385-395.
Gregory Liyanarachchi & Chris Newdick (2009). The Impact of Moral Reasoning and Retaliation on Whistle-Blowing: New Zealand Evidence. Journal of Business Ethics 89 (1):37 - 57.
Sean R. Valentine & Connie R. Bateman (2011). The Impact of Ethical Ideologies, Moral Intensity, and Social Context on Sales-Based Ethical Reasoning. Journal of Business Ethics 102 (1):155-168.
Michael E. Brown (2010). Do Ethical Leaders Get Ahead? Business Ethics Quarterly 20 (2):215-236.
Patricia C. Kelley & Dawn R. Elm (2003). The Effect of Context on Moral Intensity of Ethical Issues: Revising Jones's Issue-Contingent Model. Journal of Business Ethics 48 (2):139-154.
Pailin Trongmateerut & John T. Sweeney (2013). The Influence of Subjective Norms on Whistle-Blowing: A Cross-Cultural Investigation. Journal of Business Ethics 112 (3):437-451.
Hsin-Hua Hsiung (2012). Authentic Leadership and Employee Voice Behavior: A Multi-Level Psychological Process. Journal of Business Ethics 107 (3):349-361.
Mathieu Bouville (2008). Whistle-Blowing and Morality. Journal of Business Ethics 81 (3):579 - 585.
Sean Valentine & David Hollingworth (forthcoming). Moral Intensity, Issue Importance, and Ethical Reasoning in Operations Situations. Journal of Business Ethics.
Sara A. Morris & Robert A. McDonald (1995). The Role of Moral Intensity in Moral Judgments: An Empirical Investigation. Journal of Business Ethics 14 (9):715 - 726.
Added to index2011-10-14
Total downloads15 ( #78,782 of 551,054 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,341 of 551,054 )
How can I increase my downloads?