Politics and Ethics of the Indian Constitution
Rajeev Bhargava (ed.)
OUP India (2009)
|Abstract||This collection of essays analyses the Indian Constitution as a political or an ethical document, from a political theory perspective, reflecting configurations of power and interest or articulating a moral vision. This study of the Constitution provides a platform on which extensive political deliberations and arguments over procedural and substantive issues relating to Indian society can take place. The essays discuss ideas of equality, freedom, citizenship and property, minority rights, democracy and welfare as found in the Constitution. It also asks questions like: Does the Constitution recognize all moral rights possessed by the citizens? What importance does the Constitution accord to the rights that it recognizes? Is the section on duties consistent with the section on fundamental rights? If so, then why do tensions between rights and duties still exist? Is it because the Constitution prescribes duties over rights? Does the Constitution support liberty, equality, and fraternity in equal measure? The contributors critically examine the potential, achievements, and limitations of the Indian Constitution. They further emphasize the need to examine whether or not a serious disjunction exists between the ideals as enshrined in the Constitution and their expression. The volume also aims to resuscitate political theory in India, evolve a form of political theory that is suitable in the Indian context, and to simultaneously open up Western political theory as it exists today.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Chakravarthi Ram-Prasad (2012). Pluralism and Liberalism: Reading the Indian Constitution as a Philosophical Document for Constitutional Patriotism. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 16 (5):676-697.
Austin W. Bramwell (2004). Against Originalism: Getting Over the U. S. Constitution. Critical Review 16 (4):431-453.
Sofia Näsström (2007). The Legitimacy of the People. Political Theory 35 (5):624 - 658.
Michael Coenen, The Significance of Signatures: Why the Framers Signed the Constitution and What They Meant by Doing So.
Thomas McAffee, Overcoming Lochner in the Twenty-First Century: Taking Both Rights and Popular Sovereignty Seriously as We Seek to Secure Equal Citizenship and Promote the Public Good.
Arval A. Morris (1984). Interpretive and Noninterpretive Constitutional Theory:The Constitution, the Courts, and Human Rights. Michael J. Perry; Constitutional Fate: Theory of the Constitution. Philip Bobbitt. [REVIEW] Ethics 94 (3):501-.
Antonio Negri (2009). Insurgencies: Constituent Power and the Modern State. University of Minnesota Press.
L. G. Chincholkar (1993). Evaluation of the Social Concepts of Equality and Reservation in Indian Society in the Context of the Indian Constitution. Social Philosophy Today 9:423-437.
Nicholas Aroney (2009). The Constitution of a Federal Commonwealth: The Making and Meaning of the Australian Constitution. Cambridge University Press.
Zachary Elkins, Tom Ginsburg & James Melton, Baghdad, Tokyo, Kabul,...: Constitution Making in Occupied States.
A. Barandalla & M. Ridge (2011). Function and Self-Constitution: How to Make Something of Yourself Without Being All That You Can Be. A Commentary on Christine Korsgaard's The Constitution of Agency and Self-Constitution. Analysis 71 (2):364-380.
Larry Alexander (ed.) (1998/2001). Constitutionalism: Philosophical Foundations. Cambridge University Press.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-01-31
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?