Raúl Prebisch and the beginnings of the Latin American school of economics: a rhetorical perspective
Journal of Economic Methodology 6 (3):423-438 (1999)
|Abstract||Fifty years ago, the Argentinean economist Raúl Prebisch published a paper called Estúdio Económico de América Latina. The Estúdio was one of the first texts that set up what was later termed the ?Prebisch-Singer thesis? or, more widely, the Latin American School of Economics. According to this document, Latin American countries should undergo an industrialization program under the direct supervision of the national state. The rationale for this thesis was the deterioration of the terms of trade for countries exporting primary commodities and importing manufactured goods. The focus here is on the argumentative structure of the document, which targets two different audiences, a lay and a specialized one. Relying on a center-periphery metaphor, Prebisch stresses the shortcomings of conventional economic theory when applied to distinct historical circumstances, i.e., to the peculiar conditions experienced by peripheral countries. A rhetorical approach to the Estúdio also shows that it represents a deliberate effort to assemble a large volume of empirical data about Latin America and its foreign trade. This was not a widespread procedure at the time. As is usually the case in well-built argumentative discourses, both inclusion and omission of certain sets of data look strategically contrived.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Juan Javier Granaddelo & M. C. Mirow, The Future of the Economic Analysis of Law in Latin America: A Proposal for Alacde Model Law and Economics Civil and Commercial Codes.
Stephania Bonilla & Rosa Castro, A Law-and-Economics Analysis of International Investment Treaties: Latin America.
Susana Nuccetelli (2003). Is "Latin American Thought" Philosophy? Metaphilosophy 34 (4):524-536.
Bryan W. Husted (2002). Culture and International Anti-Corruption Agreements in Latin America. Journal of Business Ethics 37 (4):413 - 422.
Robert W. McGee & Wendy Gelman, Cheating on Taxes: A Comparative Study of Opinion in Six Latin American Countries and the USA.
Manuel Vargas (2010). On the Value of Philosophy: The Latin American Case. Comparative Philosophy 1 (1):33-52.
Mariana Ortega (2006). Phenomenological Encuentros. Radical Philosophy Review 9 (1):45-64.
Eduardo Mendieta (ed.) (2003). Latin American Philosophy: Currents, Issues, Debates. Indiana University Press.
Alexander Stehn (2012). From Positivism to ‘Anti-Positivism’ in Mexico: Some Notable Continuities. In Gregory Gilson & Irving Levinson (eds.), Latin American Positivism: New Historical and Philosophic Essays. Lexington Books.
C. Ulises Moulines (2010). Review of S. Nuccetelli Et Al. Blackwell Companion to Latin American Philosophy. [REVIEW] Metascience (19):457-460.
Guillermo Hurtado (2006). Two Models of Latin American Philosophy. Journal of Speculative Philosophy 20 (3):204-213.
Hobart A. Spalding (1992). The Two Latin American Foreign Policies of the U.S. Labor Movement: The AFL-CIO Top Brass Vs. Rank-and-File. Science and Society 56 (4):421 - 439.
Susana Nuccetelli & Gary Seay (eds.) (2003). Latin American Philosophy: An Introduction with Readings. Prentice Hall.
Susana Nuccetelli, Ofelia Schutte & Otávio Bueno (eds.) (2010). A Companion to Latin American Philosophy. Wiley-Blackwell.
Edmundo Lassalle (ed.) (1941). Philosphic Thought in Latin America. [Washington, D.C..
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-02-20
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?