Responding to alternative and polar questions

Linguistics and Philosophy 35 (5):361-406 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper gives an account of the differences between polar and alternative questions, as well as an account of the division of labor between compositional semantics and pragmatics in interpreting these types of questions. Alternative questions involve a strong exhaustivity presupposition for the mentioned alternatives. We derive this compositionally from the meaning of the final falling tone and its interaction with the pragmatics of questioning in discourse. Alternative questions are exhaustive in two ways: they exhaust the space of epistemic possibilities, as well as the space of discourse possibilities (the Question Under Discussion). In contrast, we propose that polar questions are the opposite: they present just one alternative that is necessarily non-exhaustive. The account explains a range of response patterns to alternative and polar questions, as well as differences and similarities between the two types of questions

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,221

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Focus and uninformativity in Yucatec Maya questions.Scott AnderBois - 2012 - Natural Language Semantics 20 (4):349-390.
Explanation and the theory of questions.Charles B. Cross - 1991 - Erkenntnis 34 (2):237 - 260.
Alternative questions and knowledge attributions.Maria Aloni & Paul Égré - 2010 - Philosophical Quarterly 60 (238):1-27.
Bilattices and the semantics of natural language questions.R. Nelken & N. Francez - 2002 - Linguistics and Philosophy 25 (1):37-64.
The contrast theory of why-questions.Dennis Temple - 1988 - Philosophy of Science 55 (1):141-151.
Los nombres y la referencia: semantica y metasemantica.Robert Stalnaker - 1998 - Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 17 (1):7-19.
An approach to why-questions.Antti Koura - 1988 - Synthese 74 (2):191 - 206.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-12-20

Downloads
98 (#161,867)

6 months
4 (#315,466)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Modus Ponens and the Logic of Decision.Nate Charlow - 2023 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 52 (3):859-888.
What do quantifier particles do?Anna Szabolcsi - 2015 - Linguistics and Philosophy 38 (2):159-204.
The structure of communicative acts.Sarah E. Murray & William B. Starr - 2020 - Linguistics and Philosophy 44 (2):425-474.

View all 17 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Generalized quantifiers and natural language.John Barwise & Robin Cooper - 1981 - Linguistics and Philosophy 4 (2):159--219.
Assertion.Robert Stalnaker - 1978 - Syntax and Semantics (New York Academic Press) 9:315-332.
Assertion.Robert Stalnaker - 1978 - In Maite Ezcurdia & Robert J. Stainton (eds.), The Semantics-Pragmatics Boundary in Philosophy. Broadview Press. pp. 179.
Pragmatic Presuppositions.Robert Stalnaker - 1974 - In Context and Content. Oxford University Press. pp. 47--62.
Indicative conditionals.Robert Stalnaker - 1975 - Philosophia 5 (3):269-286.

View all 38 references / Add more references