David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Educational Philosophy and Theory 42 (7):710-727 (2010)
One way to characterise pragmatism is to see it as a philosophy that placed communication at the heart of philosophical, educational and political thinking. Whereas the shift from consciousness to communication can be seen as a major innovation in modern philosophy, it is not without problems. This article highlights some of these problems and suggests a way ‘forward’ by staging a discussion between pragmatism and deconstruction. Although there are striking similarities between pragmatism and deconstruction, it is argued that pragmatism and deconstruction cannot sit as easily together as some authors assume. The reason for this is not that pragmatism and deconstruction are incompatible philosophies but rather that deconstruction occurs at the very heart of pragmatism. This implies that pragmatism can only retain its commitment to communication in philosophy, education and politics if it acknowledges and, in a sense, embraces the occurrence of deconstruction in communication. This suggests that the future of pragmatism as a philosophy for education o lies in its deconstruction, something which is expressed in the idea of a deconstructive rather than a deconstructed pragmatism
|Keywords||deconstruction difference pragmatism Derrida deconstructive pragmatism Dewey communication|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Gert Biesta (2004). Education After Deconstruction. In James Marshall (ed.), Poststructuralism, Philosophy, Pedagogy. Kluwer Academic Publishers. 27--42.
Gert Biesta (1995). Pragmatism as a Pedagogy of Communicative Action. Studies in Philosophy and Education 13 (3-4):273-290.
Gert J. J. Biesta (1998). Say You Want a Revolution... Suggestions for the Impossible Future of Critical Pedagogy. Educational Theory 48 (4):499-510.
Citations of this work BETA
Gert Biesta (2012). Philosophy of Education for the Public Good: Five Challenges and an Agenda. Educational Philosophy and Theory 44 (6):581-593.
Similar books and articles
Mitchell Aboulafia, Myra Orbach Bookman & Cathy Kemp (eds.) (2002). Habermas and Pragmatism. Routledge.
David O'Hara (2011). Pragmatism as Transition: Historicity and Hope in James, Dewey, and Rorty. The Pluralist 6 (2):70-74.
William James (1948). Essays in Pragmatism. New York, Hafner Pub. Co..
Jon Avery (1993). Three Types of American Neo-Pragmatism. Journal of Philosophical Research 18:1-13.
Richard M. Gale (2009). The Deconstruction of Traditional Philosophy in William James's Pragmatism. In John J. Stuhr (ed.), 100 Years of Pragmatism: William James's Revolutionary Philosophy. Indiana University Press.
Tadeusz Szubka (2012). On the Very Idea of Brandom's Pragmatism. Philosophia 40 (1):165-174.
Gert Biesta (2009). Witnessing Deconstruction in Education: Why Quasi-Transcendentalism Matters. Journal of Philosophy of Education 43 (3):391-404.
Robert Brandom (2011). Perspectives on Pragmatism: Classical, Recent, and Contemporary. Harvard University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads77 ( #19,490 of 1,101,847 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #128,836 of 1,101,847 )
How can I increase my downloads?