Ulysses Arrangements in Psychiatric Treatment: Towards Proposals for Their Use Based on 'Sharing' Legal Capacity [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Health Care Analysis (2):1-29 (2012)
A ‘Ulysses arrangement’ (UA) is an agreement where a patient may arrange for psychiatric treatment or non-treatment to occur at a later stage when she expects to change her mind. In this article, I focus on ‘competence-insensitive’ UAs, which raise the question of the permissibility of overriding the patient’s subsequent decisionally competent change of mind on the authority of the patient’s own prior agreement. In “The Ethical Justification for Ulysses Arrangements”, I consider sceptical and supportive arguments concerning competence-insensitive UAs, and argue that there are compelling reasons to give such UAs serious consideration. In “Decisional Competence and Legal Capacity in UAs”, I examine the nature of decisional competence and legal capacity as they arise in UAs, an issue neglected by previous research. Using the distinctions which emerge, I then identify the legal structure of a competence-insensitive UA in terms of the types of legal capacity it embodies and go on to explain how types of legal capacity might be shared between the patient and a trusted other to offer support to the patient in the creation and implementation of a competence-insensitive UA. This is significant because it suggests possibilities for building patient support mechanisms into models of legal UAs, which has not addressed in the literature to date. Drawing on this, in “Using Insights from the Competence/Capacity Distinction to Enhance Patient Support in UAs”, I offer two possible models to operationalize competence-insensitive UAs in law that allow for varying degrees of patient support through the involvement of a trusted other. Finally, I outline some potential obstacles implementing these models would face and highlight areas for further research
|Keywords||Autonomy Decisional competence Legal capacity Psychiatric treatment Ulysses arrangements|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Virginia Held (2006). The Ethics of Care: Personal, Political, and Global. Oxford University Press.
Catriona Mackenzie & Natalie Stoljar (eds.) (2000). Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Automony, Agency, and the Social Self. Oxford University Press.
Alan Gewirth (1978). Reason and Morality. University of Chicago Press.
Allen E. Buchanan (1989). Deciding for Others: The Ethics of Surrogate Decisionmaking. Cambridge University Press.
Joel Feinberg (1986). Harm to Self. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Michael Lavin (1986). Ulysses Contracts. Journal of Applied Philosophy 3 (1):89-101.
Tom Walker (2012). Ulysses Contracts in Medicine. Law and Philosophy 31 (1):77-98.
Lizabeth A. Barclay & Karen S. Markel (2009). Ethical Fairness and Human Rights: The Treatment of Employees with Psychiatric Disabilities. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 85 (3):333 - 345.
Ryan Spellecy (2003). Reviving Ulysses Contracts. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 13 (4):373-392.
Udo Schüklenk & Anita Kleinsmidt (2006). North–South Benefit Sharing Arrangements in Bioprospecting and Genetic Research: A Critical Ethical and Legal Analysis. Developing World Bioethics 6 (3):122–134.
Udo Schuklenk & Anita Kleinsmidt (2006). North–South Benefit Sharing Arrangements in Bioprospecting and Genetic Research: A Critical Ethical and Legal Analysis. Developing World Bioethics 6 (3):060814034439002-???.
John K. Davis (2008). How to Justify Enforcing a Ulysses Contract When Ulysses is Competent to Refuse. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 18 (1):pp. 87-106.
Wendy L. Packman, Mithran G. Cabot & Bruce Bongar (1994). Malpractice Arising From Negligent Psychotherapy: Ethical, Legal, and Clinical Implications of Osheroff V. Chestnut Lodge. Ethics and Behavior 4 (3):175 – 197.
Lubomira Radoilska (2012). Autonomy and Ulysses Arrangements. In Autonomy and Mental Disorder. Oxford University Press 252-280.
Shawn Fabrice Jotterand, Archie M. McClintock, Mustafa A. Alexander & M. Husain (2010). Ethics and Informed Consent of Vagus Nerve Stimulation (Vns) for Patients with Treatment-Resistant Depression (Trd). Neuroethics 3 (1).
Christian Munthe, Susanna Radovic & Henrik Anckarsäter (2010). Ethical Issues in Forensic Psychiatric Research on Mentally Disordered Offenders. Bioethics 24 (1):35-44.
Petr Bob (2006). Self-Awareness Deficits in Psychiatric Patients. Neurobiology. Assessment and Treatment. [REVIEW] Journal of Analytical Psychology 51 (2):311-312.
Laura Klaming & Pim Haselager (2013). Did My Brain Implant Make Me Do It? Questions Raised by DBS Regarding Psychological Continuity, Responsibility for Action and Mental Competence. Neuroethics 6 (3):527-539.
Theo Van Willigenburg & Patrick J. J. Delaere (2005). Protecting Autonomy as Authenticity Using Ulysses Contracts. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (4):395 – 409.
I. Gremmen, G. Widdershoven, A. Beekman, R. Zuijderhoudt & S. Sevenhuijsen (2008). Ulysses Arrangements in Psychiatry: A Matter of Good Care? Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (2):77-80.
Added to index2012-07-08
Total downloads10 ( #313,862 of 1,789,938 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #424,764 of 1,789,938 )
How can I increase my downloads?