Zygon 47 (3):501-519 (2012)
|Abstract||Abstract Despite various criticisms, Ian Barbour's fourfold classification of the possible relationships between religion and science remains influential. I compare Barbour's taxonomy with the theories of four authors who, in the last four decades, have addressed the relationship between science and religion from a Muslim perspective. The aim of my analysis is twofold. First, I offer a comparative perspective to the debate on science and Islam. Second, following Barbour's suggestion, I test the general applicability of his categories by comparing them with a discourse on science and religion that is not focused on Christianity. In the first section, I reconstruct Barbour's typologies, recalling some major objections to them, and arguing why despite the latter, Barbour's model is employed for the present analysis. I also reconstruct Barbour's parallel model for the relationships between different religions. In the second section, I reconstruct the discourse on science and religion developed by the Palestinian-American scholar Ismail Raji al-Faruqi. The third section is devoted to the ideas of the Persian-American scholar Seyyed Hossein Nasr. In the fourth section, I examine the views of the Iranian author Mehdi Golshani. The fifth section reconstructs the theories of the Algerian author Nidhal Guessoum. In the final section, I argue that a generalized use of the “integration” concept to refer to the entire debate on Islam and science is unhelpful. While these positions do not appear to instantiate Barbourian integration of science and religion, they do move toward what Barbour (skeptically) describes as integration between religions|
|Keywords||Seyyed Hossein Nasr|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Andrew P. Porter (1996). Science, Religious Language, and Analogy. Faith and Philosophy 13 (1):113-120.
Ian G. Barbour (2002). On Typologies for Relating Science and Religion. Zygon 37 (2):345-360.
Jared Michael Jones (2005). Science and Religion: A Search for Synergism. Dissertation, Texas A&M University
Adnan Aslan (1998). Religious Pluralism in Christian and Islamic Philosophy: The Thought of John Hick and Seyyed Hossein Nasr. Curzon.
Asgharali Engineer (2011). The Prophet of Non-Violence: Spirit of Peace, Compassion & Universality in Islam. Vitasta Pub..
Leif Stenberg (1996). Seyyed Hossein Nasr and Ziauddin Sardar on Islam and Science: Marginalization or Modernization of a Religious Tradition. Social Epistemology 10 (3 & 4):273 – 287.
Richard Olson (2011). A Dynamic Model for “Science and Religion”: Interacting Subcultures. Zygon 46 (1):65-83.
Seyyed Hossein Nasr (1996). Religion & the Order of Nature. Oxford University Press.
Stefano Bigliardi (2011). Snakes From Staves? Science, Scriptures, and the Supernatural in Maurice Bucaille. Zygon 46 (4):793-805.
Geoffrey Cantor & Chris Kenny (2001). Barbour's Fourfold Way: Problems with His Taxonomy of Science-Religion Relationships. Zygon 36 (4):765-781.
Seyyed Hossein Nasr (1967). Islamic Studies: Essays on Law and Society, the Sciences, and Philosophy and Sufism. Librairie Du Liban.
Ian G. Barbour (1966). Issues in Science and Religion. Prentice-Hall.
Ian G. Barbour (1990). Religion in an Age of Science. Harper and Row.
Added to index2012-08-24
Total downloads48 ( #26,452 of 722,700 )
Recent downloads (6 months)43 ( #1,789 of 722,700 )
How can I increase my downloads?