Synthese 190 (4):619-637 (2013)
|Abstract||In the article I discuss possible amendments and corrections to Lewis’s semantics for counterfactuals that are necessary in order to account for the indeterministic and non-local character of the quantum world. I argue that Lewis’s criteria of similarity between possible worlds produce incorrect valuations for alternate-outcome counterfactuals in the EPR case. Later I discuss an alternative semantics which rejects the notion of miraculous events and relies entirely on the comparison of the agreement with respect to individual facts. However, a controversy exists whether to include future indeterministic events in the criteria of similarity. J. Bennett has suggested that an indeterministic event count toward similarity only if it is a result of the same causal chain as in the actual world. I claim that a much better agreement with the demands of the quantum-mechanical indeterminism can be achieved when we stipulate that possible worlds which differ only with respect to indeterministic facts that take place after the antecedent-event should always be treated as equally similar to the actual world. In the article I analyze and dismiss some common-sense counterexamples to this claim. Finally, I critically evaluate Bennett’s proposal regarding the truth-conditions for true-antecedent counterfactuals|
|Keywords||Counterfactuals Indeterminism Quantum mechanics True-antecedent counterfactuals|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Ruth E. Kastner (2003). The Nature of the Controversy Over Time‐Symmetric Quantum Counterfactuals. Philosophy of Science 70 (1):145-163.
Charles B. Cross (2008). Antecedent-Relative Comparative World Similarity. Journal of Philosophical Logic 37 (2):101-120.
Barak Krakauer (2012). Counterpossibles. Dissertation, University of Massachusetts
Stephen Barker (2011). Can Counterfactuals Really Be About Possible Worlds? Noûs 45 (3):557-576.
Tomasz Bigaj (2006). Non-Locality and Possible Worlds. A Counterfactual Perspective on Quantum Entanglement. Ontos Verlag.
Aidan McGlynn (2012). The Problem of True-True Counterfactuals. Analysis 72 (2):276-285.
S. Barker (1999). Counterfactuals, Probabilistic Counterfactuals and Causation. Mind 108 (431):427-469.
Phillip Goggans (1992). Do the Closest Counterfactual Worlds Contain Miracles? Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 73 (2):137 - 149.
Alan Penczek (1997). Counterfactuals with True Components. Erkenntnis 46 (1):79-85.
Tomasz Bigaj (2007). Counterfactuals and Non-Locality of Quantum Mechanics: The Bedford–Stapp Version of the GHZ Theorem. [REVIEW] Foundations of Science 12 (1):85-108.
Ana Arregui (2009). On Similarity in Counterfactuals. Linguistics and Philosophy 32 (3):245-278.
Tomasz Bigaj (2004). Counterfactuals and Spatiotemporal Events. Synthese 142 (1):1 - 19.
Thad M. Botham, A Survey of David Lewis's Theory of Counterfactuals: Resolved Difficulties and Resilient Obstacles.
Boris Kment (2006). Counterfactuals and Explanation. Mind 115 (458):261-310.
Added to index2012-10-05
Total downloads11 ( #107,331 of 722,764 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #20,343 of 722,764 )
How can I increase my downloads?