Peace and justice: A limited reconciliation [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 5 (2):167-179 (2002)
This paper aims to relax the tension between the political requirements of making peace and the moral demands of doing justice, in light of the peace processes in South Africa and Northern Ireland. It begins by arguing that criminal justice should be reconceived as consisting primarily in the vindication of victims, both direct and indirect. This is not to deny the retributive punishment of perpetrators any role at all, only to insist that it be largely subservient to the goal of vindication. Why should we take such an account of justice to be true? The paper offers two reasons. First, Christians – and even secularist liberals – have a prima facie reason in the consonance of this account with the Bible's eudaimonistic conception of justice as ordered to the restoration of healthy community. Second, since all concepts of criminal justice share the basic notion of putting right what is wrong, it would be odd if the repair of damage done to victims (i.e., their vindication) were not prominent among its concerns; and there are reasons to suppose that this vindication should actually predominate in relation to the other principles of justice (the retributive balancing of crime and punishment, and the reform of the criminal for his own sake). In its final sections, the paper applies the proposed conception of criminal justice to the peace processes in South Africa and Northern Ireland, and concludes that in both cases, notwithstanding concessions to the politics of peace-making, considerable justice has been done.
|Keywords||Bible criminal justice Northern Ireland's ‘Peace Process’ retributive punishment South Africa's Truth and Reconciliation Commission vindication of victims|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Danielle Poe (ed.) (2011). Communities of Peace: Confronting Injustice and Creating Justice. Rodopi.
Michael Davis (2000). Revenge, Victim's Rights, and Criminal Justice. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 14 (1):119-128.
Daniel Philpott (2009). An Ethic of Political Reconciliation. Ethics and International Affairs 23 (4):389-407.
James D. Sellmann (2009). Asian Insights on Violence and Peace. Asian Philosophy 19 (2):159 – 171.
Elizabeth A. Linehan (2005). Crime and Catholic Tradition. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 79:61-72.
David J. Cornwell (2006). Criminal Punishment and Restorative Justice: Past, Present, and Future Perspectives. North American Distributor, International Specialised Book Services.
Trudy Govier (2006). Taking Wrongs Seriously: Acknowledgement, Reconciliation, and the Politics of Sustainable Peace. Humanity Books.
Patrick Kerans (1982). Punishment Vs. Reconciliation: Retributive Justice and Social Justice in the Light of Social Ethics. Queen's Theological College.
Howard Richards (1992/1996). Letters From Quebec: A Philosophy for Peace and Justice. International Scholars Publications.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads13 ( #120,462 of 1,101,091 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #290,337 of 1,101,091 )
How can I increase my downloads?