Graduate studies at Western
Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (1):139-147 (2008)
|Abstract||The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of plagiarism detection software and penalty for plagiarizing in detecting and deterring plagiarism among medical students. The study was a continuation of previously published research in which second-year medicals students from 2001/2002 and 2002/2003 school years were required to write an essay based on one of the four scientific articles offered by the instructor. Students from 2004/2005 (N = 92) included in present study were given the same task. Topics of two of the four articles were considered less complex, and two were more complex. One less and one more complex articles were available only as hardcopies, whereas the other two were available in electronic format. The students from 2001/2002 (N = 111) were only told to write an original essay, whereas the students from 2002/2003 (N = 87) were additionally warned against plagiarism, explained what plagiarism was, and how to avoid it. The students from 2004/2005 were warned that their essays would be examined by plagiarism detection software and that those who had plagiarized would be penalized. Students from 2004/2005 plagiarized significantly less of their essays than students from the previous two groups (2% vs. 17% vs. 21%, respectively, P P P < 0.001) as a source for their essays, but it did not influence the rate of plagiarism. Use of plagiarism detection software in evaluation of essays and consequent penalties had effectively deterred students from plagiarizing.|
|Keywords||Plagiarism Scientific misconduct Students, Medical Schools, Medical|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Yongyan Li (2013). Text-Based Plagiarism in Scientific Writing: What Chinese Supervisors Think About Copying and How to Reduce It in Students' Writing. Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (2):569-583.
Rubén Comas-Forgas & Jaume Sureda-Negre (2010). Academic Plagiarism: Explanatory Factors From Students' Perspective. [REVIEW] Journal of Academic Ethics 8 (3):217-232.
J. Caleb Clanton (2009). A Moral Case Against Certain Uses of Plagiarism Detection Services. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 23 (1):17-26.
Jaume Sureda-Negre (2010). Academic Plagiarism: Explanatory Factors From Students' Perspective. [REVIEW] Journal of Academic Ethics 8 (3):217-232.
Melinda Rosenberg (2011). Principled Autonomy and Plagiarism. Journal of Academic Ethics 9 (1):61-69.
Babak Sohrabi, Aryan Gholipour & Neda Mohammadesmaeili (2011). Effects of Personality and Information Technology on Plagiarism: An Iranian Perspective. Ethics and Behavior 21 (5):367 - 379.
Niall Hayes & Lucas D. Introna (2005). Cultural Values, Plagiarism, and Fairness: When Plagiarism Gets in the Way of Learning. Ethics and Behavior 15 (3):213 – 231.
Neil Granitz & Dana Loewy (2007). Applying Ethical Theories: Interpreting and Responding to Student Plagiarism. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 72 (3):293 - 306.
Ksenija Baždarić, Lidija Bilić-Zulle, Gordana Brumini & Mladen Petrovečki (2012). Prevalence of Plagiarism in Recent Submissions to the Croatian Medical Journal. Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (2):223-239.
Dominic A. Sisti (2007). How Do High School Students Justify Internet Plagiarism? Ethics and Behavior 17 (3):215 – 231.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads21 ( #65,382 of 722,947 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 722,947 )
How can I increase my downloads?