Selection of Socially Responsible Portfolios Using Hedonic Prices

Journal of Business Ethics 115 (3):515-529 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper presents a novel framework for selecting socially responsible investment (SRI) portfolios. The Hedonic Price Method (HPM) is applied to obtain an evaluation of SRI criteria that is integrated into a multi-objective mathematical programming model. The HPM breaks away from the traditional view that goods are the direct object of utility; on the contrary, it assumes that utility is derived from the properties or characteristics of the goods themselves. As far as the investment decision is concerned, we assume that socially responsible investmentmutual funds (SRI funds) constitute heterogeneous goods. Our approach allows us to obtain a portfolio, the financial performance of which is similar to that which the investor would have reached if he or she had not taken into account social, ethical, and environmental considerations when making his or her investment decisions. This is achieved by designing a two-stage multi-objective mathematical programming procedure. In the first stage, we achieve the maximum level of financial satisfaction that the investor can receive. In the second stage, the portfolio with the best financial–social behavior is built. For the purpose of this second stage, the first stage portfolio is used as a benchmark for the financial performance of a socially responsible portfolio. To apply this methodology, we use portfolios composed of socially responsible and conventional mutual funds domiciled in Spain

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Socially Responsible Investing: A Critical Appraisal. [REVIEW]D. Bruce Johnsen - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 43 (3):219 - 222.
Ethical (sri) funds in italy: A review.Silvana Signori - 2009 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 18 (2):145-164.
Information Asymmetry and Socially Responsible Investment.Mark Jonathan Rhodes - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 95 (1):145 - 151.
Socially Responsible Investing in the United States.Steve Schueth - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 43 (3):189 - 194.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-08-03

Downloads
36 (#432,773)

6 months
6 (#504,917)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Theory of Games and Economic Behavior.John Von Neumann & Oskar Morgenstern - 1944 - Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press.
Morals and Markets.Craig Mackenzie & Alan Lewis - 1999 - Business Ethics Quarterly 9 (3):439-452.
Support for investor activism among U.k. Ethical investors.Alan Lewis & Craig Mackenzie - 2000 - Journal of Business Ethics 24 (3):215 - 222.
Morals and Markets.Alan Lewis - 1999 - Business Ethics Quarterly 9 (3):439-452.

View all 8 references / Add more references