The Aesthetic Experience of the Authentic Painting: A Test for Aesthetic Meaning

Dissertation, Yale University (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Most scholarship about paintings in the Western artistic tradition rests upon the assumption that the object of its analysis is authentic as in "authentic Picasso" or "authentic Rembrandt." In particular, art historical and stylistic analysis of paintings originates from the conviction that the painting in question comes from the hands of an individual painter, and therefore, from the conviction that it is what it purports to be, and was created under a specific set of circumstances. Most views of the aesthetic experience, however, question the aesthetic relevance of authenticity because they consider that origin-related properties are extrinsic to the aesthetic experience of paintings. Thus, the art historical prevalence of the authentic painted image puts to the test views of the nature of the aesthetic experience and of aesthetic meaning. ;This dissertation examines the notion of authenticity in painting vis-a-vis a concept of aesthetic meaning. In particular, this analysis deals with the question whether the fact that a painting actually is an "authentic A"---where A stands in for the name of an individual painter---is an intrinsic component of aesthetic meaning. First, I offer an analysis of the notion of aesthetic meaning vis-a-vis the aesthetic experience. Then, this analysis is put under the test of the aesthetic experience of authentic paintings. ;While most theories of aesthetic meaning analyze it from the point of view of its proper source, that is, from an epistemological point of view, I examine the content of the aesthetic experience as a semantic and ontological problem. The main idea is that the nature of aesthetic content is such that it questions the distinction, at the basis of both Formalism and Critical views of the aesthetic experience, between the qualitative and the relational properties of paintings. Aesthetic meaning includes not only the qualitative properties of the pictorial surface, but also those properties that paintings have concerning their relation with the purported author and the circumstances of their creation

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Characterizing Aesthetic Experience.Haewan Lee - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 1:161-167.
Exploring the Relationship between Humor and Aesthetic Experience.Mordechai Gordon - 2012 - Journal of Aesthetic Education 46 (1):111-121.
Aesthetic Experience and Value.Richard R. Mccarty - 1984 - Dissertation, University of Missouri - Columbia
The Broad View of Aesthetic Experience.Alan H. Goldman - 2013 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 71 (4):323-333.
Category Independent Aesthetic Experience: The Case of Wine.David Sackris - 2013 - Journal of Value Inquiry 47 (1-2):111-120.
The aesthetic experience.Derek Matravers - 2003 - British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (2):158-174.
The art of seeing: an interpretation of the aesthetic encounter.Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi - 1990 - Los Angeles, Calif.: Getty Center for Education in the Arts. Edited by Rick Emery Robinson.
Aesthetic experience and aesthetic value.Robert Stecker - 2006 - Philosophy Compass 1 (1):1–10.
Mieczysław Wallis: Experience and Value.Monika Bokiniec - 2009 - Estetika: The European Journal of Aesthetics 46 (1):75-96.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-05

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references