Philosophy and Public Affairs 31 (3):272–279 (2003)
|Abstract||This article criticises one of Stuart Rachels' and Larry Temkin's arguments against the transitivity of 'better than'. This argument invokes our intuitions about our preferences of different bundles of pleasurable or painful experiences of varying intensity and duration, which, it is argued, will typically be intransitive. This article defends the transitivity of 'better than' by showing that Rachels and Temkin are mistaken to suppose that preferences satisfying their assumptions must be intransitive. It makes cler where the argument goes wrong by showing that it is a version of Zeno's paradox of Achilles and the Tortoise.|
|Keywords||Transitivity Decision Theory Zeno's Paradox|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
B. de Schuymer, H. de Meyer, B. de Baets & S. Jenei (2003). On the Cycle-Transitivity of the Dice Model. Theory and Decision 54 (3):261-285.
Leonard Angel (2002). Zeno's Arrow, Newton's Mechanics, and Bell's Inequalities. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 53 (2):161-182.
Ofra Magidor (2008). Another Note on Zeno's Arrow. Phronesis 53 (s 4-5):359-372.
Wesley C. Salmon (ed.) (1970). Zeno's Paradoxes. Bobbs-Merrill.
Robert Elliot (2005). Instrumental Value in Nature as a Basis for the Intrinsic Value of Nature as a Whole. Environmental Ethics 27 (1):43-56.
Phil Hopkins (2006). Zeno's Boêtheia Tôi Logôi. Epoché 11 (1):1-25.
David M. Sherry (1988). Zeno's Metrical Paradox Revisited. Philosophy of Science 55 (1):58-73.
Gerald J. Massey (1969). Toward a Clarification of Grünbaum's Conception of an Intrinsic Metric. Philosophy of Science 36 (4):331-345.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads22 ( #62,633 of 722,745 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #36,437 of 722,745 )
How can I increase my downloads?