David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Oxford University Press (2005)
Natural Justice is a bold attempt to lay the foundations for a genuine science of morals using the theory of games. Since human morality is no less a product of evolution than any other human characteristic, the book takes the view that we need to explore its origins in the food-sharing social contracts of our prehuman ancestors. It is argued that the deep structure of our current fairness norms continues to reflect the logic of these primeval social contracts, but the particular fairness norm a society operates is largely a product of cultural evolution. In pursuing this point, the book proposes a naturalistic reinterpretation of John Rawls' original position that reconciles his egalitarian theory of justice with John Harsanyi's utilitarian theory by identifying the environment appropriate to each.
|Keywords||Justice Fairness Social ethics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$6.97 used (85% off) $34.82 new (23% off) $44.95 direct from Amazon Amazon page|
|Call number||JC578.B54 2005|
|ISBN(s)||0195178122 9780195178111 0195178114|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Jennifer Prah Ruger (2011). Shared Health Governance. American Journal of Bioethics 11 (7):32 - 45.
Lorenzo Sacconi (2006). A Social Contract Account for CSR as an Extended Model of Corporate Governance (I): Rational Bargaining and Justification. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 68 (3):259 - 281.
Christine Clavien & Michel Chapuisat (2013). Altruism Across Disciplines: One Word, Multiple Meanings. Biology and Philosophy 28 (1):125-140.
Ken Binmore (2008). Do Conventions Need to Be Common Knowledge? Topoi 27 (1-2):17-27.
Shiran Rachmilevitch (2015). The Nash Solution is More Utilitarian Than Egalitarian. Theory and Decision 79 (3):463-478.
Similar books and articles
Roberto Alejandro (1998). The Limits of Rawlsian Justice. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Michael Otsuka (2010). Justice as Fairness: Luck Egalitarian, Not Rawlsian. [REVIEW] Journal of Ethics 14 (3-4):217-230.
Richard L. Lippke (1993). Justice and Insider Trading. Journal of Applied Philosophy 10 (2):215-226.
Ian Hunt (2011). How Egalitarian is Rawls's Theory of Justice? Philosophical Papers 39 (2):155-181.
David Johnston (2011). A Brief History of Justice. Wiley-Blackwell.
Percy B. Lehning (1998). The Coherence of Rawls's Plea for Democratic Equality. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 1 (4):1-41.
Paul Seabright (2006). The Evolution of Fairness Norms: An Essay on Ken Binmore's Natural Justice. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 5 (1):33-50.
H. Odera Oruka (1980). Rawls' Ideological Affinity and Justice as Egalitarian Fairness. In Lars O. Ericsson, Harald Ofstad & Giuliano Pontara (eds.), Justice, Social, and Global: Papers Presented at the Stockholm International Symposium on Justice, Held in September 1978. Akademilitteratur
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads30 ( #126,536 of 1,790,336 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #201,867 of 1,790,336 )
How can I increase my downloads?