David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ancient Philosophy 21 (1):57-71 (2001)
In De Anima III.3 Aristotle presents his official discussion of phantasia (“imagination” in most translations). At the very outset of the discussion Aristotle offers as an endoxon that “phantasia is that in virtue of which we say that a phantasma occurs to us” (428a1-2). Now a natural reading of this claim, taken up by many commentators, can pose a problem for Aristotle’s overall account of perception. Here I argue that, although it would be silly to deny that Aristotle considers phantasia to be that in virtue of which a phantasma occurs to someone, it is not silly to deny that phantasmata are present in every case in which phantasia is operative. The suggestion bolsters the idea that, according to Aristotle’s account of veridical perception, we can understand the world as making itself perceptually manifest to the perceiver.
|Keywords||Aristotle perception phantasia Martha Nussbaum Malcolm Schofield John McDowell|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Pete Mandik (2005). Action-Oriented Representation. In Andrew Brook & Kathleen Akins (eds.), Cognition and the Brain: The Philosophy and Neuroscience Movement. Cambridge University Press 284--305.
Stephen Everson (1997). Aristotle on Perception. Oxford University Press.
Dennis Lomas (1998). Representational Theory Emerges Unscathed. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (6):764-765.
Jonathan Barnes (1999). Aristotle on Perception. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 49 (01):120-122.
Sabina Lovibond (1988). Aristotle on Perception Deborah K. W. Modrak: Aristotle. The Power of Perception, Pp. X + 249. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 1987. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 38 (02):280-282.
Dejan Todorovic (2003). Color Realism and Color Illusions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (1):49-50.
John Bowin (2012). Aristotle on 'First Transitions' in De Anima II 5. Apeiron 45 (3):262-282.
Dave Ward (2012). Why Don't Synaesthetic Colours Adapt Away? Philosophical Studies 159 (1):123-138.
J. A. Towey (1999). Aristotle on the Sense Organs (Review). [REVIEW] Journal of Hellenic Studies 119:192-193.
Phil Corkum (2010). Attention, Perception, and Thought in Aristotle. Dialogue 49 (2):199-222.
Eric LaRock (2002). Against the Functionalist Reading of Aristotle's Philosophy of Perception and Emotion. International Philosophical Quarterly 42 (2):231-258.
Sophie Schwartz, Frédéric Assal, Nathalie Valenza, Mohamed L. Seghier & Patrik Vuilleumier (2005). Illusory Persistence of Touch After Right Parietal Damage: Neural Correlates of Tactile Awareness. Brain 128 (2):277-290.
Robert Heinaman (2007). Actuality, Potentiality and "De Anima II.5". Phronesis 52 (2):139 - 187.
Mary R. Newsome & P. N. Johnson-Laird (2006). How Falsity Dispels Fallacies. Thinking and Reasoning 12 (2):214 – 234.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads38 ( #93,727 of 1,777,936 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #123,860 of 1,777,936 )
How can I increase my downloads?