Authorship under review
Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (3) (1997)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesRobert L. Perkins (ed.) (2010). The Point of View. Mercer University Press.
José M. González (2011). The Question of Authorship (A.) Beecroft Authorship and Cultural Identity in Early Greece and China. Patterns of Literary Circulation. Pp. X + 328. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. Cased, £50, US$85. ISBN: 978-0-521-19431-0. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 61 (02):349-351.
Christy Mag Uidhir (2011). Minimal Authorship (of Sorts). Philosophical Studies 154 (3):373-387.
James R. Wilson (2002). Responsible Authorship and Peer Review. Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (2).
David B. Resnik & Zubin Master (2011). Criteria for Authorship in Bioethics. American Journal of Bioethics 11 (10):17 - 21.
Anne Hudson Jones (2003). Can Authorship Policies Help Prevent Scientific Misconduct? What Role for Scientific Societies? Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (2):243-256.
Eugen Tarnow (1999). The Authorship List in Science: Junior Physicists' Perceptions of Who Appears and Why. Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (1).
Barton Moffatt (2011). Responsible Authorship: Why Researchers Must Forgo Honorary Authorship. Accountability in Research 18 (2):76-90.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads1 ( #274,921 of 549,119 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
