Damned if you do, damned if you don't: The scientific community's responses to whistleblowing

Abstract
The papers in this issue are based on presentations by the authors at the 163nd National Meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Seattle, Washington, 13–18 February 1997 in the session entitled Damned If You Do, Damned If You Don’t: What the Scientific Community Can Do about Whistleblowing organized by Stephanie J. Bird and Diane Hoffman-Kim. The papers have been modified following double blind peer review.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11948-998-0001-6
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 17,739
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Joan E. Sieber (1998). The Psychology of Whistleblowing. Science and Engineering Ethics 4 (1):7-23.
Robert L. Sprague (1998). The Voice of Experience. Science and Engineering Ethics 4 (1):33-44.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

73 ( #49,262 of 1,777,336 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

5 ( #123,595 of 1,777,336 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.