Ethics and social science: Which kind of co-operation? [Book Review]
Graduate studies at Western
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 2 (4):319-336 (1999)
|Abstract||The relation between ethics and social science is often conceived as complementary, both disciplines cooperating in the solution of concrete moral problems. Against this, the paper argues that not only applied ethics but even certain parts of general ethics have to incorporate sociological and psychological data and theories from the start. Applied ethics depends on social science in order to asses the impact of its own principles on the concrete realities which these principles are to regulate as well as in order to propose practice rules suited to adapt these principles to their respective contexts of application. Examples from medical ethics (embryo research) and ecological ethics (Leopold's land ethic) illustrate both the contingence of practice rules in relation to their underlying basic principles and the corresponding need for a co-operation between philosophy and empirical disciplines in judging their functional merits and demerits. In conclusion, the relevance of empirical hypotheses even for some of the perennial problems of ethics is shown by clarifying the role played by empirical theories in the controversies about the ethical differentiation between positive and negative responsibility and the relation between utility maximisation and (seemingly) independent criteria of distributive justice in the context of social distributions.|
|Keywords||applied ethics consequentialism distributive justice ethical methodology social science utilitarianism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Albino Barrera (2000). Social Principles as a Framework for Ethical Analysis (with an Application to the Tobin Tax). Journal of Business Ethics 23 (4):377 - 388.
Onora O'neill (2009). Applied Ethics: Naturalism, Normativity and Public Policy. Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (3):219-230.
Christian Fuchs, Robert M. Bichler & Celina Raffl (2009). Cyberethics and Co-Operation in the Information Society. Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (4):447-466.
Alberto Bondolfi (2000). Ethics, Law and Legislation: The Institutionalisation of Moral Reflection. [REVIEW] Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 3 (1):27-37.
Alan G. Johnson (2006). Making Sense of Medical Ethics: A Hands-on Guide. Distributed in the U.S.A. By Oxford University Press.
Kenneth Kipnis (1991). Ethics and the Professional Responsibility of Lawyers. Journal of Business Ethics 10 (8):569 - 576.
Carlo Leget, Pascal Borry & Raymond de Vries (2009). 'Nobody Tosses a Dwarf!' The Relation Between the Empirical and the Normative Reexamined. Bioethics 23 (4):226-235.
Sebastian Schleidgen, Michael C. Jungert & Robert H. Bauer (2010). Mission: Impossible? On Empirical-Normative Collaboration in Ethical Reasoning. [REVIEW] Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 13 (1):59 - 73.
Claus Strue Frederiksen (2010). The Relation Between Policies Concerning Corporate Social Responsibility (Csr) and Philosophical Moral Theories – an Empirical Investigation. Journal of Business Ethics 93 (3):357 - 371.
Albert W. Musschenga (2005). Empirical Ethics, Context-Sensitivity, and Contextualism. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (5):467 – 490.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads22 ( #62,705 of 739,318 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,243 of 739,318 )
How can I increase my downloads?