Paradigms and Parameters for the Comparative Study of Religious and Ideological Ethics

Journal of Religious Ethics 9 (2):157 - 185 (1981)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article analyzes several characteristic features of moral systems viewed as cultural realities. Moralities are viewed as historically transmitted languages of persuasion, by means of which persons communicate expectations and demands. For purpose of comparative studies, the article proposes that moral systems be analyzed in relation to their typical patterns of moral reasoning, moral meanings, social functions, and moral authority. The article examines several analytical typologies for comparing these constituitive dimensions of moral systems.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Max Weber and the Comparative Study of Religious Ethics.David Little - 1974 - Journal of Religious Ethics 2 (2):5 - 40.
Judging others: History, ethics, and the purposes of comparison.Aaron Stalnaker - 2008 - Journal of Religious Ethics 36 (3):425-444.
The Present State of the Comparative Study of Religious Ethics.David Little - 1981 - Journal of Religious Ethics 9 (2):210 - 227.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
10 (#1,123,760)

6 months
1 (#1,444,594)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The nature of managerial moral standards.Frederick Bird & James A. Waters - 1987 - Journal of Business Ethics 6 (1):1 - 13.
Judging others: History, ethics, and the purposes of comparison.Aaron Stalnaker - 2008 - Journal of Religious Ethics 36 (3):425-444.
The Ethics and Politics of Religious Ethics, 1973–2023.Richard B. Miller - 2023 - Journal of Religious Ethics 51 (1):66-107.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references