Pragmatic concerns and images of the world
Philosophia 38 (4):715-731 (2010)
| Abstract | I defend a pragmatist reinterpretation of Sellars’s famous manifest-scientific distinction. I claim that in order to do justice to this important distinction we must first recognize, despite what philosophers—including, arguably, Sellars—often make of it, that the distinction does not draw an epistemological or metaphysical boundary between different kinds of objects and events, but a pragmatic boundary between different ways in which we interact with objects and events. Put differently, I argue that the manifest-scientific distinction, in my view, can be best understood, not as a metaphysical distinction between apparent and real objects and events, or an epistemological distinction between perceptible and imperceptible objects and events, but rather as a distinction, which is not necessarily rigid over time, between distinct ways in which we collectively deal, in practice, with objects and events. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,865 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Configure |
Kristie Miller (2008). Thing and Object. Acta Analytica 23 (1):69-89.
Huiming Ren (2012). The Distinction Between Knowledge-That and Knowledge-How. Philosophia 40 (4):857-875.
Rolf-Peter Horstmann (2006). Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit as an Argument for a Monistic Ontology. Inquiry 49 (1):103 – 118.
Lynne Rudder Baker (2008). The Shrinking Difference Between Artifacts and Natural Objects. American Philosophical Association Newsletter on Philosophy and Computers.
Rudolf Haag (2004). Quantum Theory and the Division of the World. Mind and Matter 2 (2):53-66.
John Kulvicki (2005). Perceptual Content, Information, and the Primary/Secondary Quality Distinction. Philosophical Studies 122 (2):103-131.
Risto Hilpinen (2007). On the Objects and Interpretants of Signs: Comments on T. L. Short's Peirce's Theory of Signs. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43 (4):610 - 618.
Risto Hilpinen (2007). On the Objects and Interpretants of Signs: Comments on T. L. Short's. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43 (4).
Frederick F. Schmitt (1983). Events. Erkenntnis 20 (3):281 - 293.
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-03-06Total downloads24 ( #52,435 of 556,772 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,754 of 556,772 )How can I increase my downloads? |

