Rigor mortis: A response to Nilsson's 'logic and artificial intelligence'
Artificial Intelligence 47:57-78 (1991)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesRajakishore Nath (2009). Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence: A Critique of the Mechanistic Theory of Mind. Universal Publishers.
Tracy B. Henley (1990). Natural Problems and Artificial Intelligence. Behavior and Philosophy 18 (2):43-55.
Otto Neumaier (1987). A Wittgensteinian View of Artificial Intelligence. In Artificial Intelligence. St Martin's Press.
Steven Torrance (ed.) (1984). The Mind And The Machine: Philosophical Aspects Of Artificial Intelligence. Chichester: Horwood.
Betty A. Sichel (1969). Are Aims of Education Suffering From a Case of Rigor Mortis? Educational Philosophy and Theory 1 (2):17–27.
Murat Aydede & Guven Guzeldere (2000). Consciousness, Intentionality, and Intelligence: Some Foundational Issues for Artificial Intelligence. Journal Of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 12 (3):263-277.
Gerard Casey (1988). Artificial Intelligence and Wittgenstein. Philosophical Studies 32:156-175.
Laurence Tamatea (2010). Online Buddhist and Christian Responses to Artificial Intelligence. Zygon 45 (4):979-1002.
Neil Nilsson (1991). Logic and Artificial Intelligence. Artificial Intelligence 47:31-56.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads22 ( #56,242 of 549,117 )Recent downloads (6 months)10 ( #6,862 of 549,117 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
