Responsible research: What is expected? Commentary on: “Statistical power, the Belmont report, and the ethics of clinical trials”
Graduate studies at Western
Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (4):693-696 (2010)
|Abstract||“Responsible research” and “good science” are concepts with various meanings depending on one’s perspective and assumptions. Fellow researchers, research participants, policy makers and the general public also have differing expectations of the benefits of research ranging from accurate and reliable data that extend the body of knowledge, to solutions to societal concerns. Unless these differing constituencies articulate their differing views they may fail to communicate and undermine the value of research to society|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Stephanie Bird (2010). Responsible Research: What is Expected? Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (4):693-696.
Maurie Markman (2004). The Research Misconception. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 18 (2):241-252.
George Howard (2010). Statistical Power, the Belmont Report, and the Ethics of Clinical Trials. Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (4):675-691.
Sara Vollmer & George Howard (2010). Statistical Power, the Belmont Report, and the Ethics of Clinical Trials. Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (4):675-691.
Jeremy Sugarman (2004). Using Empirical Data to Inform the Ethical Evaluation of Placebo Controlled Trials. Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (1):29-35.
David L. DeMets (1999). Statistics and Ethics in Medical Research. Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (1):97-117.
Margaret B. Liu (2010). A Clinical Trials Manual From the Duke Clinical Research Institute: Lessons From a Horse Named Jim. Wiley-Blackwell.
Joe Giffels, Sara Vollmer & Stephanie Bird (2010). Editors' Overview: Topics in the Responsible Management of Research Data. Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (4):631-637.
Simon Woods & Pauline Mccormack (2013). Disputing the Ethics of Research: The Challenge From Bioethics and Patient Activism to the Interpretation of the Declaration of Helsinki in Clinical Trials. Bioethics 27 (5):243-250.
Danielle Laudy (2009). End of Life Pediatric Research: What About the Ethics? [REVIEW] Journal of Academic Ethics 7 (1-2):87-91.
Patrick L. Taylor (2010). Overseeing Innovative Therapy Without Mistaking It for Research: A Function-Based Model Based on Old Truths, New Capacities, and Lessons From Stem Cells. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (2):286-302.
Malcolm G. Booth (2007). Informed Consent in Emergency Research: A Contradiction in Terms. Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (3):351-359.
Marion Danis (ed.) (2012). Clinical Research Consultation: A Casebook. Oxford University Press.
Angela Ballantyne (2008). Benefits to Research Subjects in International Trials: Do They Reduce Exploitation or Increase Undue Inducement? Developing World Bioethics 8 (3):178-191.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2010-12-13
Total downloads2 ( #246,859 of 738,608 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?