Graduate studies at Western
Metaphilosophy 42 (4):376-380 (2011)
|Abstract||Abstract: This article argues that Christine Korsgaard's conception of self-constitution can be historicized by considering the impact of actual humans on our reflective activity. Because Korsgaard bases her argument on a philosophy of action rather than of intention (as Kant does), and our actions must always be concrete, the article argues that the principles for action which we develop in reflection are likewise responses to concrete human demands. It further interprets the types of demands humans make on each other as the expression of historical circumstance rather than as transcendentally anchored. The notion of universal respect that reflection seeks to achieve is thus seen as developing by a self-correcting process of concrete human interaction. Finally, the article concludes that there can be no metaphysical proof of morality, since morality develops through human interaction that seeks to approximate the idea of respect for persons|
|Keywords||history Kant self‐constitution reflection Korsgaard|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
David Cummiskey (2011). Korsgaard's Rejection of Consequentialism. Metaphilosophy 42 (4):360-367.
William F. Bristow (2006). Self-Consciousness, Normativity and Abysmal Freedom. Inquiry 49 (6):498 – 523.
Lydia Moland (2011). Agency and Practical Identity: A Hegelian Response to Korsgaard. Metaphilosophy 42 (4):368-375.
David M. Rasmussen (2003). Reasonability, Normativity, and the Cosmopolitan Imagination: Arendt, Korsgaard, and Rawls. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 36 (2):97-112.
Paul Russell (2006). Practical Reason and Motivational Scepticism. In Heiner F. Klemme Dieter Schönecker & Manfred Kuehn (eds.), “Practical Reason and Motivational Scepticism”, in Heiner F. Klemme, Manfred Kuehn, Dieter Schönecker, eds., Moralische Motivation. Kant und die Alternativen. Kant-Forschungen. Felix Meiner Verlag.
Christine M. Korsgaard (1996). The Sources of Normativity. Cambridge University Press.
Camillia Kong (2012). The Normative Source of Kantian Hypothetical Imperatives. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 20 (5):661-690.
Bryan Lueck (2009). Kant's Fact of Reason as Source of Normativity. Inquiry 52 (6):596 – 608.
Robert Shaver (2006). Korsgaard on Hypothetical Imperatives. Philosophical Studies 129 (2):335 - 347.
Ariela Tubert (2011). Korsgaard's Constitutive Arguments and the Principles of Practical Reason. Philosophical Quarterly 61 (243):343-362.
Christine M. Korsgaard (2011). Natural Goodness, Rightness, and the Intersubjectivity of Reason: Reply to Arroyo, Cummiskey, Moland, and Bird-Pollan. Metaphilosophy 42 (4):381-394.
Christian Onof (2009). Reconstructing the Grounding of Kant's Ethics: A Critical Assessment. Kant-Studien 100 (4):496-517.
P. Fristedt (2011). Normativity and Interpretation: Korsgaard's Deontology and the Hermeneutic Conception of the Subject. Philosophy and Social Criticism 37 (5):533-550.
Added to index2011-07-05
Total downloads10 ( #114,693 of 749,901 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #62,995 of 749,901 )
How can I increase my downloads?