Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Business Ethics 73 (1):1 - 9 (2007)
|Abstract||Three principles must be taken into account in assessing the social responsibilities of international business firms in developing areas. The first is an awareness of the historical and institutional dynamics of local communities. This influences the type and range of responsibilities the firm can be expected to assume; it also reveals the limitations of any universal codes of conduct. The second is the necessity of non-intimidating communication with local constituencies. This requires the firm to temper its power and influence by recognizing and responding to local concerns in the pursuit of its own objectives. The third is the degree to which the firm's operations safeguard and indeed improve the social and economic assets of local communities. At issue is the question of adequate compensation for the inevitable disruptions that an international business brings to a local community. Beneficial returns must be shared and sustained over the long term in an equitable manner. The nine studies in this special edition illustrate in different ways the importance of these three principles|
|Keywords||dialog sustainability social responsibility institutional context|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Gerald F. Cavanagh (2004). Global Business Ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly 14 (4):625-642.
Michael Santoro (2010). Ahoy There! Business Ethics Quarterly 20 (3):481-502.
Elmer W. Johnson (1986). General Motors Corporation, its Constituencies and the Public Interest. Journal of Business Ethics 5 (3):173 - 176.
Esben Rahbek Pedersen (2010). Modelling Csr: How Managers Understand the Responsibilities of Business Towards Society. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 91 (2):155 - 166.
Russell Daye (2009). Poverty, Race Relations, and the Practices of International Business: A Study of Fiji. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 89 (2):115 - 127.
Paul Kapelus (2002). Mining, Corporate Social Responsibility and the "Community": The Case of Rio Tinto, Richards Bay Minerals and the Mbonambi. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 39 (3):275 - 296.
David Wheeler, Heike Fabig & Richard Boele (2002). Paradoxes and Dilemmas for Stakeholder Responsive Firms in the Extractive Sector: Lessons From the Case of Shell and the Ogoni. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 39 (3):297 - 318.
Sybille Sachs & Marc Maurer (2009). Toward Dynamic Corporate Stakeholder Responsibility: From Corporate Social Responsibility Toward a Comprehensive and Dynamic View of Corporate Stakeholder Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 85 (3):535 - 544.
Sybille Sachs & Marc Maurer (2009). Toward Dynamic Corporate Stakeholder Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 85 (3):535-544.
Frederick Bird (2009). The Ethical Responsibilities of Businesses in Developing Areas. Journal of Business Ethics 89 (2):85 - 97.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads14 ( #90,611 of 739,709 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?