David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Analysis 71 (4):651-653 (2011)
Davidson's paratactic account of indirect speech exploits the fact that ‘that’ can be either a demonstrative pronoun or a subordinating conjunction. Davidson thinks that the fact that it is plausible to think that it inherited the latter function from the former lends support to his account. However, in other languages the two functions are performed by unrelated words, which makes the account impossible to apply to them. I argue that this shows that, rather than revealing the underlying form of indirect reports, the account reflects only a quirk of English
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Julian Dodd (1997). Indirect Speech, Parataxis and the Nature of Things Said. Journal of Philosophical Research 22:211-227.
Keith Frankish (1996). How Should We Revise the Paratactic Theory? Analysis 56 (4):251–262.
Michael Alan Johnson (2009). Indirect Discourse: Parataxis, the Propositional Function Modification, and “That”. Aporia 19 (1):9-24.
Rockney Jacobsen (2009). Davidson and First-Person Authority: Parataxis and Self-Expression. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 90 (2):251-266.
Ivan Welty (2011). Frege on Indirect Proof. History and Philosophy of Logic 32 (3):283-290.
Herman Cappelen & Ernie Lepore (1997). Varieties of Quotation. Mind 106 (423):429-450.
Stefano Predelli (2008). The Demonstrative Theory of Quotation. Linguistics and Philosophy 31 (5):555-572.
Marga Reimer (2011). A Davidsonian Perspective on Psychiatric Delusions. Philosophical Psychology 24 (5):659 - 677.
Peter Lipton (2007). Alien Abduction: Inference to the Best Explanation and the Management of Testimony. Episteme 4 (3):238-251.
Martin Montminy (2012). Epistemic Modals and Indirect Weak Suggestives. Dialectica 66 (4):583-606.
I. G. McFetridge (1975). Propositions and Davidson's Account of Indirect Discourse. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 76:131 - 145.
Carolyn Price (2003). Artificial Functions and the Meaning of Literary Works. British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (1):1-17.
Joseph Shieber (2009). Epistemological Contextualism and the Knowledge Account of Assertion. Philosophia 37 (1):169-181.
Added to index2011-08-28
Total downloads39 ( #44,797 of 1,102,972 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #46,900 of 1,102,972 )
How can I increase my downloads?