Erkenntnis 63 (1):55 - 71 (2005)
|Abstract||Kellert ("In the Wake of Chars", University of Chicago press, Chicago, 1993) has argued that Laplacean determinism in classical physics is actually a layered concept, where various properties or layers composing this form of determinism can be peeled away. Here, I argue that a layered conception of determinism is inappropriate and that we should think in terms of different deterministic models applicable to different kinds of systems. The upshot of this analysis is that the notion of state is more closely tied to the kind of system being investigated than is usually considered in discussions of determinism. So when investigating determinism corresponding changes to the appropriate notion of state -- and, perhaps, the state space itself -- also need to be considered|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
N. G. Kampen (1991). Determinism and Predictability. Synthese 89 (2):273 - 281.
Galen Strawson (1989). Consciousness, Free Will, and the Unimportance of Determinism. Inquiry 32 (March):3-27.
Lawrence E. Fraley (1994). Uncertainty About Determinism: A Critical Review of Challenges to the Determinism of Modern Science. Behavior and Philosophy 22 (2):71 - 83.
Peter van Inwagen (1975). The Incompatibility of Free Will and Determinism. Philosophical Studies 27 (March):185-99.
Noa Latham (2004). Determinism, Randomness, and Value. Philosophical Topics 32 (1-2):153-167.
Robert Miller (1999). Biological Determinism Versus the Concept of a Person. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):901-902.
Robert C. Bishop (2003). On Separating Predictability and Determinism. Erkenntnis 58 (2):169--88.
Robert C. Bishop (2005). Anvil or Onion? Determinism as a Layered Concept. Erkenntnis 63 (1):55 - 71.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads2 ( #245,513 of 722,699 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?