Graduate studies at Western
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 70 (2):109-126 (2011)
|Abstract||It is widely agreed that the ‘Logical’ Argument from Evil (LAFE) is bankrupt. We aim to rehabilitate the LAFE, in the form of what we call the Normatively Relativised Logical Argument from Evil (NRLAFE). There are many different versions of a NRLAFE. We aim to show that one version, what we call the ‘right relationship’ NRLAFE, poses a significant threat to personal-omniGod-theism—understood as requiring the belief that there is an omnipotent, omniscient, perfectly good person who has created our world—because it appeals to value commitments theists themselves are likely to endorse. The ultimate success of this NRLAFE will rest on developing a theological ethics of right relationship that rejects as morally flawed the exercise of omnipotence first to sustain horrors and then to redeem them. Yet a vindicated NRLAFE of this sort need not require atheism, but only rejection of the standard conception of God as a personal omniGod|
|Keywords||Theism Argument from Evil Theodicy Skeptical theism Relationship ethics Concepts of God|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
James R. Beebe, Logical Problem of Evil. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Robert Lehe (2009). The Nihilistic Consequences of the Argument From Evil. International Philosophical Quarterly 49 (4):427-437.
Daniel Howard-Snyder (2005). On Rowe's Argument From Particular Horrors. In Kelly Clark (ed.), Readings in Philosophy of Religion. Broadview.
Jason Megill (2011). Evil and the Many Universes Response. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 70 (2):127-138.
Richard Otte (2000). Evidential Arguments From Evil. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 48 (1):1-10.
Mark T. Nelson (1991). Naturalistic Ethics and the Argument From Evil. Faith and Philosophy 8 (3):368-379.
Michael Almeida (2004). The New Evidential Argument Defeated. Philo 7 (1):22-35.
Daniel Howard-Snyder (ed.) (1996). The Evidential Argument From Evil. Indiana University Press.
Krzysztof Hubaczek (2007). William Rowe's Bayesian Argument From Evil Against the Existence of God: An Attempt at Analysis and Assessment (in Polish). Diametros 14:32 - 52.
Daniel Howard-Snyder (2008). Theodicy. In Kelly Clark (ed.), Readings in the Philosophy of Religion. Broadview.
James A. Keller (1989). The Problem of Evil and the Attributes of God. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 26 (3):155 - 171.
Richard Carrier (2007). Fatal Flaws in Michael Almeida's Alleged 'Defeat' of Rowe's New Evidential Argument From Evil. Philo 10 (1):85-90.
Michael P. Levine (1999). The Problem of Evil. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 1999:127-146.
Added to index2011-01-17
Total downloads77 ( #12,812 of 737,480 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,045 of 737,480 )
How can I increase my downloads?