Does Infant Cognition Research Undermine Sociological Theory? A Critique of Bergesen's Attack on Durkheim

Abstract This article discusses how the results of infant research challenge the assumptions of the classical sciences of social behaviour. According to A.J. Bergesen, the findings of infant research invalidate Durkheim's theory of mental categories, thus requiring a re-theorizing of sociology. This article argues that Bergesen's reading of Emile Durkheim is incorrect, and his review of the infant research in fact invalidates his argument. Reviewing the assumptions of sociology in the light of the findings of infant research, it is argued that the real challenge is to formulate a research strategy that combines the findings of the two sciences
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 5,672
External links
  • Through your library Configure

    Similar books and articles
    Albert J. Bergesen (2012). Turning Durkheim on His Head: A Reply to Peterson and Bjerre. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 42 (4):485-495.
    Warren Schmaus (2003). Is Durkheim the Enemy of Evolutionary Psychology? Philosophy of the Social Sciences 33 (1):25-52.
    Andrew Chignell (2001). Infant Suffering Revisited. Religious Studies 37 (4):475-484.

    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2012-06-29

    Total downloads

    7 ( #133,420 of 549,068 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    1 ( #63,185 of 549,068 )

    How can I increase my downloads?


    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.

    Other forums