Does Infant Cognition Research Undermine Sociological Theory? A Critique of Bergesen's Attack on Durkheim

Abstract
This article discusses how the results of infant research challenge the assumptions of the classical sciences of social behaviour. According to A.J. Bergesen, the findings of infant research invalidate Durkheim's theory of mental categories, thus requiring a re-theorizing of sociology. This article argues that Bergesen's reading of Emile Durkheim is incorrect, and his review of the infant research in fact invalidates his argument. Reviewing the assumptions of sociology in the light of the findings of infant research, it is argued that the real challenge is to formulate a research strategy that combines the findings of the two sciences
Keywords Durkheim  infant cognition  mind  categories  socialisation  culture
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 12,088
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Albert J. Bergesen (2004). Chomsky Versus Mead. Sociological Theory 22 (3):357-370.
Merlin W. Donald (2004). 2 The Definition of Human Nature. In D. Rees & Steven P. R. Rose (eds.), The New Brain Sciences: Perils and Prospects. Cambridge University Press. 34.
Émile Durkheim (1909). Sociologie Religieuse Et Théorie de la Connaissance. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 17 (6):733 - 758.

View all 7 references

Citations of this work BETA
Albert J. Bergesen (2012). Turning Durkheim on His Head: A Reply to Peterson and Bjerre. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 42 (4):485-495.
Similar books and articles
Albert J. Bergesen (2012). Turning Durkheim on His Head: A Reply to Peterson and Bjerre. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 42 (4):485-495.
Warren Schmaus (2003). Is Durkheim the Enemy of Evolutionary Psychology? Philosophy of the Social Sciences 33 (1):25-52.
Stephen Langfur (2013). The You-I Event: On the Genesis of Self-Awareness. [REVIEW] Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 12 (4):769-790.
Andrew Chignell (2001). Infant Suffering Revisited. Religious Studies 37 (4):475-484.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2012-06-29

Total downloads

9 ( #165,686 of 1,101,944 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #306,569 of 1,101,944 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.