Adding to the Mix: Integrating ELSI into a National Nanoscale Science and Technology Center
Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):743-760 (2011)
| Abstract | This paper describes issues associated with integrating the study of Ethical, Legal and Social Issues (ELSI) into ongoing scientific and technical research and describes an approach adopted by the authors for their own work with the center for nanophase materials sciences (CNMS) at the Oak Ridge national laboratory (ORNL). Four key questions are considered: (a) What is ELSI and how should it identify and address topics of interest for the CNMS? (b) What advantages accrue to incorporating ELSI into the CNMS? (c) How should the integration of ELSI into the CNMS take place? (d) How should one judge the effectiveness of the activity? We conclude that ELSI research is not a monolithic body of knowledge, but should be adapted to the question at hand. Our approach focuses on junctures in the R&D continuum at which key decisions occur, avoids topics of a purely ethical nature or advocacy, and seeks to gather data in ways that permit testing the validity of generalization. Integrating ELSI into the CNMS allows dealing with topics firmly grounded in science, offers concrete examples of potential downstream applications and provides access to the scientists using the CNMS and their insights and observations. As well, integration provides the opportunity for R&D managers to benefit from ELSI insights and the potential to modify R&D agendas. Successful integration is dependent on the particular ELSI question set that drives the project. In this case questions sought to identify key choices, information of value to scientists, institutional attributes, key attributes of the CNMS culture, and alternatives for communicating results. The opportunity to consult with scientists on ELSI implications is offered, but not promoted. Finally, ELSI effectiveness is judged by observing the use to which research products are put within the CNMS, ORNL, and the community of external scholars | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,631 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJulio R. Tuma (2011). Nanoethics and the Breaching of Boundaries: A Heuristic for Going From Encouragement to a Fuller Integration of Ethical, Legal and Social Issues and Science. Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):761-767.
Eline Bunnik, Maartje Schermer & A. Cecile Janssens (2011). Personal Genome Testing: Test Characteristics to Clarify the Discourse on Ethical, Legal and Societal Issues. BMC Medical Ethics 12 (1):11-.
Gail E. Henderson, Eric T. Juengst, Nancy M. P. King, Kristine Kuczynski & Marsha Michie (2012). What Research Ethics Should Learn From Genomics and Society Research: Lessons From the ELSI Congress of 2011. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 40 (4):1008-1024.
Audra J. Wolfe (2001). Review: ELSI's Revenge. [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Biology 34 (1):183 - 193.
Herman T. Tavani (2004). Genomic Research and Data-Mining Technology: Implications for Personal Privacy and Informed Consent. Ethics and Information Technology 6 (1):15-28.
Judy Illes, Raymond de Vries, Mildred Cho & Pam Schraedley-Desmond (2006). ELSI Priorities for Brain Imaging. American Journal of Bioethics 6 (2):W24-W31.
Zara Merali, Peter A. Singer, Victor Boulijenkov & Abdallah S. Daar (2004). The ELSI Genetics Regulatory Resource Kit: A Tool for Policymakers in Developing Countries. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 32 (4):692-700.
Melody J. Slashinski, Sheryl A. McCurdy, Laura S. Achenbaum, Simon N. Whitney & Amy L. McGuire (2012). “Snake-Oil,” “Quack Medicine,” and “Industrially Cultured Organisms:” Biovalue and the Commercialization of Human Microbiome Research. BMC Medical Ethics 13 (1):28-.
Pablo Schyfter (2012). Technological Biology? Things and Kinds in Synthetic Biology. Biology and Philosophy 27 (1):29-48.
Debasmita Patra (2011). Responsible Development of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology: Contextualizing Socio-Technical Integration Into the Nanofabrication Laboratories in the USA. Nanoethics 5 (2):143-157.
Julie Robillard, Carole Federico, Kate Tairyan, Adrian Ivinson & Judy Illes (2011). Untapped Ethical Resources for Neurodegeneration Research. BMC Medical Ethics 12:9-.
Ana Viseu & Heather Maguire (2012). Integrating and Enacting 'Social and Ethical Issues' in Nanotechnology Practices. Nanoethics 6 (3):195-209.
Göran Hermerén (2007). Challenges in the Evaluation of Nanoscale Research: Ethical Aspects. NanoEthics 1 (3).
Jutta Schickore (2009). Studying Justificatory Practice: An Attempt to Integrate the History and Philosophy of Science. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 23 (1):85-107.
Alfred Nordmann (2009). Invisible Origins of Nanotechnology: Herbert Gleiter, Materials Science, and Questions of Prestige. Perspectives on Science 17 (2):pp. 123-143.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2011-11-09Total downloads1 ( #274,507 of 548,973 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,511 of 548,973 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
