Argumentation as Rational Persuasion

Argumentation 26 (1):71-81 (2012)
Abstract
I argue that argumentation is not to be identified with (attempted) rational persuasion, because although rational persuasion appears to consist of arguments, some uses of arguments are not attempts at rational persuasion. However, the use of arguments in argumentative communication to try to persuade is one kind of attempt at rational persuasion. What makes it rational is that its informing ideal is to persuade on the basis of adequate grounds, grounds that make it reasonable and rational to accept the claim at issue
Keywords Argument  Persuasion  Rational persuasion  Advertising  Inquiry  Problem-solving  Decision making
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 9,360
External links
  • Through your library Configure
    References found in this work BETA

    View all 7 references

    Citations of this work BETA

    No citations found.

    Similar books and articles
    Katarzyna Budzyńska (2006). Persuasion. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 6 (2):343-362.
    Hung-Yul So (2007). Beyond Rational Insanity. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 1:221-227.
    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2011-09-28

    Total downloads

    23 ( #63,369 of 1,088,810 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    2 ( #42,739 of 1,088,810 )

    How can I increase my downloads?

    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.