David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Res Publica 6 (2):179-198 (2000)
Political judgment is notoriously hard to theorise, and in the recent debates surrounding Habermas's discourse ethics we encounter classic disagreements around the nature, operation and validity of such judgments. This paper evaluates Habermas's account of political judgment and explores the problems raised by his critics. It then focuses on the contentious role played by universals within his account. What emerges is a reformulated theory of judgment based on the thin universalism of fair deliberation, and a description of a sub-set of judgments, termed ``democratic judgments'', which are oriented to the preservation of democracy.
|Keywords||deliberation democracy discourse ethics Habermas justification Kant Neo-Aristotelianism political judgment reflective judgment Wittgenstein|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Mark C. Murphy (1997). Surrender of Judgment and the Consent Theory of Political Authority. Law and Philosophy 16 (2):115 - 143.
Jacqueline L. Reck (2000). Ethics and Budget Allocation Decisions of Municipal Budget Officers. Journal of Business Ethics 27 (4):335 - 350.
Majid Yar (2000). From Actor to Spectator: Hannah Arendt's 'Two Theories' of Political Judgment. Philosophy and Social Criticism 26 (2):1-27.
Béatrice Longuenesse (2003). Kant's Theory of Judgment, and Judgments of Taste: On Henry Allison's "Kant's Theory of Taste". [REVIEW] Inquiry 46 (2):143 – 163.
R. Lanier Anderson (2008). Review: Comments on Wayne Martin, Theories of Judgment. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 137 (1):91-108.
Linda M. G. Zerilli (2005). "We Feel Our Freedom": Imagination and Judgment in the Thought of Hannah Arendt. Political Theory 33 (2):158 - 188.
Kyle Swan (2004). Moral Judgment and Emotions. Journal of Value Inquiry 38 (3):375-381.
Alessandro Ferrara (1999). Justice and Judgment: The Rise and the Prospect of the Judgment Model in Contemporary Political Philosophy. Sage.
Albena Azmanova (2012). The Scandal of Reason: A Critical Theory of Political Judgment. Columbia University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads21 ( #96,098 of 1,692,645 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #75,732 of 1,692,645 )
How can I increase my downloads?