David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Oxford University Press (2006)
This book makes a vigorous reassessment of the moral dimension in Chaucer's writings. For the Middle Ages, the study of human behavior generally signified the study of the morality of attitudes, choices, and actions. Moreover, moral analysis was not gender neutral: it presupposed that certain virtues and certain failings were largely gender-specific. Alcuin Blamires, mainly concentrating on The Canterbury Tales, discloses how Chaucer adapts the composite inherited traditions of moral literature to shape the significance and the gender implications of his narratives. Chaucer, Ethics, and Gender is therefore not a theorization of ethical reading but a discussion of Chaucer's engagement with the literature of practical ethical advice. Working with the commonplace primary sources of the period, Blamires demonstrates that Stoic ideals, somewhat uncomfortably absorbed within medieval Christian moral codes as Chaucer realized, penetrate the poet's constructions of how women and men behave in matters (for instance) of friendship and anger, sexuality and chastity, protest and sufferance, generosity and greed, credulity and foresight. The book will be absorbing for all serious readers or teachers of Chaucer because it is packed with commanding new insights. It offers illuminating explanations concerning topics that have often eluded critics in the past: the flood-forecast in The Miller's Tale, for example; or the status of emotion and equanimity in The Franklin's Tale; the "unethical" sexual trading in the Shipman's Tale; the contemporary moral force of a widow's curse in The Friar's Tale; and the quizzical moral link between the Wife of Bath's Prologue and Tale. There is even a new hypothesis about the conceptual design of The Canterbury Tales as a whole. Deeply informed and historically alert, this is a book that engages its reader in the vital role played by ethical assumptions (with their attendant gender assumptions) in Chaucer's major poetry.
|Keywords||Ethics, Medieval, in literature Virtues in literature Sex role in literature|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$8.00 used (96% off) $59.94 new (64% off) $165.00 direct from Amazon Amazon page|
|Call number||PR1875.E84.B57 2008|
|ISBN(s)||9780199534623 0199248672 9780199248674|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Warren Ginsberg (1995). Book Review: Chaucer's Ovidian Arts of Love. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Literature 19 (1):180-181.
Michael A. Calabrese (1995). Book Review: Chaucer's Ovidian Arts of Love. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Literature 19 (1).
Bernard Levi Jefferson (1965). Chaucer and the Consolation of Philosophy of Boethius. New York, Haskell House.
Claire Colebrook (2004). Gender. Palgrave Macmillan.
Bruce W. Holsinger (2001). Music, Body, and Desire in Medieval Culture: Hildegard of Bingen to Chaucer. Stanford University Press.
Jessica Rosenfeld (2010). Ethics and Enjoyment in Late Medieval Poetry: Love After Aristotle. Cambridge University Press.
J. D. Burnley (1979). Chaucer's Language and the Philosophers' Tradition. Rowman & Littlefield.
Mark Miller (2004). Philosophical Chaucer: Love, Sex, and Agency in the Canterbury Tales. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads138 ( #27,342 of 1,907,507 )
Recent downloads (6 months)24 ( #28,763 of 1,907,507 )
How can I increase my downloads?