Denial and contrast: A relevance theoretic analysis of but
Linguistics and Philosophy 12 (1):15 - 37 (1989)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesIgal Kvart (1994). Causal Independence. Philosophy of Science 61 (1):96-114.
Walter Schroyens, Niki Verschueren, Walter Schaeken & Gery D'Ydewalle (2000). Conditional Reasoning with Negations: Implicit and Explicit Affirmation or Denial and the Role of Contrast Classes. Thinking and Reasoning 6 (3):221 – 251.
Garrel Pottinger (1979). On Analysing Relevance Constructively. Studia Logica 38 (2):171 - 185.
L. Jonathan Cohen (1994). Some Steps Towards a General Theory of Relevance. Synthese 101 (2):171 - 185.
Jeremy Avigad & Richard Sommer (1997). A Model-Theoretic Approach to Ordinal Analysis. Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 3 (1):17-52.
Thomas Forster & Thierry Libert (2010). An Order-Theoretic Account of Some Set-Theoretic Paradoxes. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 52 (1):1-19.
Jennifer Spenader & Emar Maier (2009). Contrast as Denial in Multi-Dimensional Semantics. Journal of Pragmatics 41:1707-26.
Emar Maier & Jennifer Spenader (2004). Contrast as Denial. In Jonathan Ginzburg & Enric Vallduví (eds.), Proceedings of Catalog'04: The 8th Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads22 ( #57,090 of 556,840 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #39,122 of 556,840 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
