Dr. frankenstein meets Lord Devlin: Genetic engineering and the principle of intangible harm
The Monist 89 (4):526-547 (2006)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJohn Norris (1993). Lord Devlin and the Enforcement of Morals. Cogito 7 (1):67-70.
S. Matthew Liao (2008). Selecting Children: The Ethics of Reproductive Genetic Engineering. Philosophy Compass 3 (5):973-991.
Matti Häyry (1998). Genetic Engineering and the Risk of Harm. Medicine, Healthcare and Philosophy 1 (1):61-64.
Jason Borenstein (2009). The Wisdom of Caution: Genetic Enhancement and Future Children. Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (4).
James Lindemann Nelson (1997). Book Review: The Frankenstein Syndrome: Ethical and Social Issues in the Genetic Engineering of Animals, by Bernard E. Rollin. [REVIEW] Journal of Value Inquiry 31 (2):281-283.
James Lindemann Nelson (1997). Book Review: The Frankenstein Syndrome: Ethical and Social Issues in the Genetic Engineering of Animals, by Bernard E. Rollin. [REVIEW] Journal of Value Inquiry 31 (2):281-283.
Russell Powell (2010). The Evolutionary Biological Implications of Human Genetic Engineering. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 37 (1):22.
Nils Holtug (2002). The Harm Principle. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 5 (4):357-389.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads24 ( #52,493 of 556,888 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,931 of 556,888 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
