Memetics does provide a useful way of understanding cultural evolution
In Francisco José Ayala & Robert Arp (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Biology. Wiley-Blackwell Pub. (2010)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links | This entry has no external links. Add one. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesWerner Mende & Kathleen Wermke (2006). A Long Way to Understanding Cultural Evolution. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (4):358-359.
Simon M. Reader (2006). Evo-Devo, Modularity, and Evolvability: Insights for Cultural Evolution. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (4):361-362.
Joanna J. Bryson (2007). Embodiment Versus Memetics. Mind and Society 7 (1):77-94.
Susan Blackmore (2005). Implications for Memetics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):490-490.
Matt Gers (2008). The Case for Memes. Biological Theory 3 (4):305-315.
Susan Blackmore (2006). Why We Need Memetics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (4):349-350.
William C. Wimsatt (2010). Memetics Does Not Provide a Useful Way of Understanding Cultural Evolution : A Developmental Perspective. In Francisco José Ayala & Robert Arp (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Biology. Wiley-Blackwell Pub..
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2010-05-19Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
