Privacy in America: The frontier of duty and restraint
Journal of Mass Media Ethics 9 (4):213 – 234 (1994)
| Abstract | Topics at a Poynter Institute privacy conference in December 1992 ranged from the role and obligations of the journalist to the rights of victims. Journalists' responsibility to fulfill a dual role of truthtelling and minimizing harm to vulnerable people in society framed the discussion. The public' s curiosity and media obsessions with information about victims of sex crimes are the first topics to be explored. Bob Steele of the Poynter Institute sets the stage for the delicate balance. Helen Benedict, author of Virgin or Vamp: How the Press Covers Sex Crimes, suggests some reforms regarding this area of news. Patricia Bowman, a victim's advocate, talks about her experience as the victim of the media and of a celebrated sex crime case. Elinor Brecher of the Miami Herald discusses a particularly vexing assignment she recently faced, and Tom French of the St. Petersburg Times expresses concern for the subjects of sensitive personal stories and recommends trying to inform them about the story and help them cope with the intrusion into their private life. In separate articles, J. T. Johnson of Sartor Associates in San Francisco and Nora Paul of the Poynter Institute offer insights into the paradox of individual privacy and public right/desire to know, particularly as the issues arise in today's information society. Finally, Robert Ellis Smith, publisher of Privacy Journal, outlines ways media can approach privacy issues and still feel they are on safe ground; he recommends self-restraint in place of government restrictions. The general theme of the Poynter Conference is restraint and concern for others' responsible usage of information that has the possibility to harm others. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,865 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesLars Øystein Ursin (2008). Biobank Research and the Right to Privacy. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (4):267-285.
Lawrence O. Gostin (2001). Health Information: Reconciling Personal Privacy with the Public Good of Human Health. Health Care Analysis 9 (3):321-335.
Elin Palm (2009). Privacy Expectations at Work—What is Reasonable and Why? Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12 (2):201 - 215.
Luciano Floridi (2006). Four Challenges for a Theory of Informational Privacy. Ethics and Information Technology 8 (3).
Helen Nissenbaum (1997). Toward an Approach to Privacy in Public: Challenges of Information Technology. Ethics and Behavior 7 (3):207 – 219.
Lars Oystein Ursin (2010). Privacy and Property in the Biobank Context. HEC Forum 22 (3):211-224.
Candace Cummins Gauthier (2002). Privacy Invasion by the News Media: Three Ethical Models. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 17 (1):20 – 34.
Wendell Cochran (1996). Computers, Privacy, and Journalists: A Suggested Code of Information Practices. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 11 (4):210 – 222.
Louis Hodges (1994). The Journalist and Privacy. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 9 (4):197 – 212.
L. Paul Husselbee (1994). Respecting Privacy in an Information Society: A Journalist's Dilemma. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 9 (3):145 – 156.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads4 ( #180,404 of 556,788 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
