Philosophical Quarterly 58 (233):597-617 (2008)
|Abstract||Stewart Cohen argues that several epistemological theories fall victim to the problem of easy knowledge: they allow us to know far too easily that certain sceptical hypotheses are false and that how things seem is a reliable indicator of how they are. This problem is a result of the theories' interaction with an epistemic closure principle. Cohen suggests that the theories should be modified. I argue that attempts to solve the problem should focus on closure instead; a new and plausible epistemic closure principle can solve the problem of easy knowledge. My solution offers a uniform and more successful response to different versions of the problem of easy knowledge|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Kelly Becker (2012). Basic Knowledge and Easy Understanding. Acta Analytica 27 (2):145-161.
John Greco (2010). Achieving Knowledge: A Virtue-Theoretic Account of Epistemic Normativity. Cambridge University Press.
Steven Luper (2007). The Easy Argument. Acta Analytica 22 (4):321 - 331.
P. Baumann (2006). Information, Closure, and Knowledge: On Jäger's Objection to Dretske. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 64 (3):403 - 408.
Ram Neta (2005). A Contextualist Solution to the Problem of Easy Knowledge. Grazer Philosophische Studien 69 (1):183-206.
Scott Scheall (2011). Later Wittgenstein and the Problem of Easy Knowledge. Philosophical Investigations 34 (3):268-286.
Hamid Vahid (2007). Varieties of Easy Knowledge Inference: A Resolution. [REVIEW] Acta Analytica 22 (3):223-237.
Peter J. Markie (2005). Easy Knowledge. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (2):406–416.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads146 ( #3,569 of 722,764 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #20,343 of 722,764 )
How can I increase my downloads?