Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 110 (1):1-13 (2010)
|Abstract||In this paper I consider recent developments in neo-pragmatism, and in particular the degree of convergence between such approaches and those placing greater emphasis on truth and truth-makers. I urge that although a global pragmatism has its merits, it by no means closes the space for a more Wittgensteinian, finer-grained, approach to the diversity of functions served by modal, causal, moral, or other modes of thought|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
M. D. Rutherford (2006). Rituals Are Rational for the Imperfect Experimentalist. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (6):628-629.
Robert Brandom (2011). Perspectives on Pragmatism: Classical, Recent, and Contemporary. Harvard University Press.
William James (1948). Essays in Pragmatism. New York, Hafner Pub. Co..
Joseph J. Fins, Matthew D. Bacchetta & Franklin G. Miller (1997). Clinical Pragmatism: A Method of Moral Problem Solving. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 7 (2):129-143.
Jaroslav Peregrin (2005). Brandom and Davidsom: What Do We Need to Account for Thinking and Agency? Philosophica 75.
Kuipers, Theo A. F. & Wisniewski, Andrzej (1994). An Erotetic Approach to Explanation by Specification. Erkenntnis 40 (3):377-402.
Larry A. Hickman (2004). Pragmatism, Postmodernism, and Global Citizenship. Metaphilosophy 35 (1‐2):65-81.
Dirk Greimann (1997). Die Idee Hinter Tarskis Definition Von Wahrheit. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 28 (1):121-158.
Added to index2010-04-25
Total downloads57 ( #20,756 of 722,681 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #36,274 of 722,681 )
How can I increase my downloads?