Overcoming Relativism and Absolutism: Dewey's ideals of truth and meaning in philosophy for children
Educational Philosophy and Theory 43 (5):453-466 (2011)
|Abstract||Different notions of truth imply and encourage different ideals of thinking, knowledge, meaning, and learning. Thus, these concepts have fundamental importance for educational theory and practice. In this paper, I intend to draw out and clarify the notions of truth, knowledge and meaning that are implied by P4C's pedagogical ideals. There is some disagreement amongst P4C theorists and practitioners about whether the community of inquiry implies either relativism or absolutism. I will argue that both relativism and absolutism are incompatible with P4C, as neither one of them can facilitate all of P4C's ideals of reflective thinking, community, fallibilism, care, open-mindedness, empathy, and meaningfulness. I will argue that P4C incorporates Dewey's middle ground position between relativism and absolutism|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Matthew Lipman (1999). What is Happening with P4C? The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 3:21-26.
Byron L. Haines (1993). A Critique of Harman's Empiric Relativism. Journal of Philosophical Research 18:97-107.
F. F. Centore (2000). Two Views of Virtue: Absolute Relativism and Relative Absolutism. Greenwood Press.
Marie-France Daniel & Emmanuelle Auriac (2011). Philosophy, Critical Thinking and Philosophy for Children1. Educational Philosophy and Theory 43 (5):415-435.
Ragnar Francén (2007). Metaethical Relativism: Against the Single Analysis Assumption. Dissertation, University of Gothenburg
Robert F. Allen (1998). Absolutism Vs. Relativism in Contemporary Ontology. Journal of Philosophical Research 23:343-352.
James O. Young (2009). Relativism, Standards and Aesthetic Judgements. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 17 (2):221 – 231.
Karin Saskia Murris (2008). Philosophy with Children, the Stingray and the Educative Value of Disequilibrium. Journal of Philosophy of Education 42 (3-4):667-685.
Achim Lohmar (2006). Why Content Relativism Does Not Imply Fact Relativism. Grazer Philosophische Studien 73 (1):145-162.
Added to index2009-11-19
Total downloads57 ( #17,767 of 556,908 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,931 of 556,908 )
How can I increase my downloads?