Der „religiöse“ Charakter von Heideggers philosophischer Methode
Studia Phaenomenologica 11:285-307 (2011)
| Abstract | The question addressed in this article is to what extent a destructed concept of religion can be said to characterize the philosophical method of Martin Heidegger. In order to approach this question, we first characterize his method as “Vollzug der Fraglichkeit”: philosophy in its deepest sense does not mean to give answers to questions but to ask questions. According to Heidegger, the execution of questioning consists in the “transforming repetition” of the leading question (Leitfrage) of philosophy in order to ask the basic question of philosophy (Grundfrage). In the second part of the article, we reflect on the “religious” character of Heidegger’s method of questioning. The reflection makes use of different etymological derivations of the word ‘Religion’: relegere (to observe carefully), re-eligere (to choose again), religare (to bind back), relinquere (to leave behind). In the third part of the article, we discuss what Heidegger’s “religious” method of philosophy means for present questions concerning religion. To that end, we finish with a confrontation between Heidegger and Derrida with respect to the “religious” method of philosophy | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesVincent Blok (2012). Naming Being – or the Philosophical Content of Heidegger’s National Socialism. Heidegger Studies 28:101-122.
Nathan Eric Dickman (2009). Anxiety and the Face of the Other: Tillich and Levinas on the Origin of Questioning. Sophia 48 (3).
V. Blok (2011). An Indication of Being – Reflections on Heidegger’s Engagement with Ernst Jünger. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 42 (2):194-208.
Gabriel Cercel (2005). Der frühe Philosophiebegriff Martin Heideggers im Lichte neuerer Dokumente und Interpretationen. Studia Phaenomenologica 5:355-379.
Vincent Blok (2010). Heidegger und der Nationalsozialismus oder die Frage nach dem philosophischen Empirismus. Studia Phaenomenologica 10:273-292.
Gerhard Ehrl (2007). Heideggers Stellung zu Simmel in der Vorlesung von 1919/20. Heidegger Studies 23:71-93.
Parvis Emad (1993). Zu Fragen der Interpretation und Entizifferung der Grundlagen der Gesamtausgabe Martin Heideggers. Heidegger Studies 9:161-171.
Drew M. Dalton (2009). Otherwise Than Nothing. Philosophy and Theology 21 (1/2):105-128.
Daniel O. Dahlstrom (ed.) (2011). Interpreting Heidegger: New Essays. Cambridge University Press.
Giovanni B. Sala (1997). Bernard Lonergan's Method in Theology. Philosophy and Theology 10 (2):469-499.
Jesús Adrián Escudero (2010). Heideggers Phänomenologie der Stimmungen. Zur Welterschließenden Funktion der Angst, der Langweile Und der Verhaltenheit. Heidegger Studies 26:83-95.
Daniel O. Dahlstrom (ed.) (2011). Interpreting Heidegger: Critical Essays. Cambridge University Press.
Friedrich-Wilhelm von Herrmann (1986). Die Edition der Vorlesungen Heideggers in seiner Gesamtausgabe letzter Hand. Heidegger Studies 2:153-172.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2012-09-18Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
