Different structures for concepts of individuals, stuffs, and real kinds: One mama, more milk, and many mice
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):66-67 (1998)
|Abstract||Although our concepts of “Mama,” “milk,” and “mice” have much in common, the suggestion that they are identical in structure in the mind of the prelinguistic child is mistaken. Even infants think about objects as different from substances and appreciate the distinction between kinds (e.g., mice) and individuals (e.g., Mama). Such cognitive capacities exist in other animals as well, and have important adaptive consequences.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Marzia Soavi (2009). Antirealism and Artefact Kinds. Techné 13 (2):93-107.
Ingo Brigandt (2009). Natural Kinds in Evolution and Systematics: Metaphysical and Epistemological Considerations. Acta Biotheoretica 57:77-97.
Muhammad Ali Khalidi (2010). Interactive Kinds. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 61 (2):335-360.
Jürgen Schröder (1998). Explanatory Force, Antidescriptionism, and the Common Structure of Substance Concepts. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):84-85.
Peter Vallentyne (2005). Of Mice and Men: Equality and Animals. [REVIEW] Journal of Ethics 9 (3-4):403 - 433.
J. van Brake (1998). A White Thing. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):86-88.
Daniel W. Cunningham (1998). The Fine Structure of Real Mice. Journal of Symbolic Logic 63 (3):937-994.
Ruth Garrett Millikan (1998). Words, Concepts, and Entities: With Enemies Like These, I Don't Need Friends. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):89-100.
Ruth G. Millikan (1997). A Common Structure for Concepts of Individuals, Stuffs, and Kinds: More Mama, More Milk, and More Mouse. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):55-65.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads15 ( #85,922 of 722,783 )
Recent downloads (6 months)9 ( #11,510 of 722,783 )
How can I increase my downloads?