|Abstract||What determines our intuitions as to which objects are members of specific artifact kinds? Prior research suggests that factors such as physical appearance, current use, and intended function are not at the core of concepts such as chair, clock and pawn. The theory presented here, based on Levinson`s (1993) intentional-historical theory of our concept of art, is that we determine that something is a member of a given artifact kind by inferring that it was successfully created with the intention to belong to that kind. This theory can explain why some properties (such as shape) are more important than others (such as color) when we determine kind membership and can account for why certain objects are judged to be members of artifact kinds even though they are highly dissimilar from other members of the kinds. It can also provide a framework for explaining the conditions under which broken objects cease to be members of their kinds and new artifacts can come into existence. This account of our understanding of artifact concepts is argued to be consistent with more general "essentialist" theories of our understanding of concepts corresponding to proper..|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Beth Preston (2009). Biological and Cultural Proper Functions in Comparative Perspective. In Ulrich Krohs & Peter Kroes (eds.), Functions in Biological and Artificial Worlds: Comparative Philosophical Perspectives. Mit Press.
Nurbay Irmak (forthcoming). Software is an Abstract Artifact. Grazer Philosophische Studien.
Beth Preston (1998). Why is a Wing Like a Spoon? A Pluralist Theory of Function. Journal of Philosophy 95 (5):215-254.
Deborah G. Johnson (2006). Computer Systems: Moral Entities but Not Moral Agents. Ethics and Information Technology 8 (4).
Krist Vaesen & Melissa van Amerongen (2008). Optimality Vs. Intent: Limitations of Dennett's Artifact Hermeneutics. Philosophical Psychology 21 (6):779 – 797.
Steven Vogel (2003). The Nature of Artifacts. Environmental Ethics 25 (2):149-168.
Jeroen de Ridder (2006). The (Alleged) Inherent Normativity of Technological Explanations. Techné 10 (1):79-94.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads42 ( #27,042 of 549,078 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #15,152 of 549,078 )
How can I increase my downloads?