Mencian arguments on human nature (jen-hsing)
Philosophy East and West 44 (1):19-53 (1994)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesZhaolu Lu (1999). The Mencian Theory of Human Xing Reconsidered. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 26 (2):147-163.
Lijun Yuan (2002). Ethics of Care and Concept Of. Hypatia 17 (1):107-129.
James Behuniak (2002). Mencius on Becoming Human. Dissertation, University of Hawaii at Manoa
Jung H. Lee (2009). The Moral Power of Jim: A Mencian Reading of Huckleberry Finn. Asian Philosophy 19 (2):101 – 118.
Kim-Chong Chong (1999). The Practice of Jen. Philosophy East and West 49 (3):298-316.
Xinzhong Yao (1995). Jen , Love and Universality—Three Arguments Concerning Jen in Confucianism. Asian Philosophy 5 (2):181 – 195.
Irene Bloom (1997). Human Nature and Biological Nature in Mencius. Philosophy East and West 47 (1):21-32.
Charles Wei-Hsun Fu (1983). The Mencian Theory of Mind (Hsin)a and Nature (Hsing)B: A Modern, Philosophical Approach. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 10 (4):385-410.
Kwong-loi Shun (1997). Mencius on Jen-Hsing. Philosophy East and West 47 (1):1-20.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads2 ( #232,501 of 549,087 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
