David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Milton Friedman had long declared himself a small “l” libertarian (to distinguish himself from members of the Libertarian Party). But, libertarianism is based on the twin pillars of the non aggression axiom and private property predicated on homesteading and peaceful exchange. Friedman adopts none of this. Instead, he undergirds his [...]
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Thomas Mulligan (1986). A Critique of Milton Friedman's Essay 'the Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits'. Journal of Business Ethics 5 (4):265 - 269.
David Teira (2007). Milton Friedman, the Statistical Methodologist. History of Political Economy 39 (3):511-28.
Richard Nunan (1988). The Libertarian Conception of Corporate Property: A Critique of Milton Friedman's Views on the Social Responsibility of Business. Journal of Business Ethics 7 (12):891 - 906.
Christopher Cosans (2009). Does Milton Friedman Support a Vigorous Business Ethics? Journal of Business Ethics 87 (3):391 - 399.
David Teira (2009). Why Friedman's Methodology Did Not Generate Consensus Among Economists? Journal of the History of Economic Thought 31 (2):201-214.
Mark S. Schwartz & David Saiia (2011). Should Firms Go 'Beyond Profits'? Milton Friedman Versus Broad CSR. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 22 (1):327-338.
Bill Shaw (1988). A Reply to Thomas Mulligan's “Critique of Milton Friedman's Essay 'the Social Responsibility of Business to Increase its Profits'”. Journal of Business Ethics 7 (7):537 - 543.
Tom G. Palmer (1998). What'snotwrong with Libertarianism: Reply to Friedman. Critical Review 12 (3):337-358.
Farhad Rassekh (2000). Smith, Friedman, and Self-Interest in Ethical Society. Business Ethics Quarterly 10 (3):659-674.
David Colander (1995). Is Milton Friedman an Artist or a Scientist? Journal of Economic Methodology 2 (1):105-122.
Lawrence A. Boland (2003). Methodological Criticismvs. Ideology and Hypocrisy. Journal of Economic Methodology 10 (4):521-526.
Duane Windsor (2007). Assessing Milton Friedman's View of CSR. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 18:277-282.
Jan Narveson (1992). Libertarianism, Postlibertarianism, and the Welfare State: Reply to Friedman. Critical Review 6 (1):45-82.
Added to index2010-12-09
Total downloads37 ( #45,620 of 1,099,035 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #287,293 of 1,099,035 )
How can I increase my downloads?