David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophical Review 90 (1):5-43 (1981)
Let psychologism be the doctrine that whether behavior is intelligent behavior depends on the character of the internal information processing that produces it. More specifically, I mean psychologism to involve the doctrine that two systems could have actual and potential behavior _typical_ of familiar intelligent beings, that the two systems could be exactly alike in their actual and potential behavior, and in their behavioral dispositions and capacities and counterfactual behavioral properties (i.e., what behaviors, behavioral dispositions, and behavioral capacities they would have exhibited had their stimuli differed)--the two systems could be alike in all these ways, yet there could be a difference in the information processing that mediates their stimuli and responses that determines that one is not at all intelligent while the other is fully intelligent.
|Keywords||Behaviorism Information Intelligence Process Psychologism Science Turing Machines|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Frank Jackson (2009). Thought Experiments and Possibilities. Analysis 69 (1):100-109.
Ned Block (1986). Advertisement for a Semantics for Psychology. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 10 (1):615-78.
Peter Godfrey-Smith (2009). Triviality Arguments Against Functionalism. Philosophical Studies 145 (2):273 - 295.
John Aach (1990). Psychologism Reconsidered: A Re-Evaluation of the Arguments of Frege and Husserl. Synthese 85 (2):315 - 338.
John Barresi (1987). Prospects for the Cyberiad: Certain Limits on Human Self-Knowledge in the Cybernetic Age. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 17 (March):19-46.
Similar books and articles
Terry Dartnall (2000). Reverse Psychologism, Cognition and Content. Minds and Machines 10 (1):31-52.
Peter Kugel (2002). Computing Machines Can't Be Intelligent (...And Turing Said So). Minds and Machines 12 (4):563-579.
Alex Kirlik (1997). Rediscovering Turing's Brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (4):752-753.
Eric Wiland (2003). Psychologism, Practical Reason and the Possibility of Error. Philosophical Quarterly 53 (210):68–78.
Adrian Cussins (1987). Varieties of Psychologism. Synthese 70 (1):123 - 154.
Luke Jerzykiewicz & Sam Scott (2003). Psychologism and Conceptual Semantics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (6):682-683.
Dale Jacquette (1993). Who's Afraid of the Turing Test? Behavior and Philosophy 20 (21):63-74.
Robert C. Richardson (1982). Turing Tests for Intelligence: Ned Block's Defense of Psychologism. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 41 (May):421-6.
Hanoch Ben-Yami (2005). Behaviorism and Psychologism: Why Block's Argument Against Behaviorism is Unsound. Philosophical Psychology 18 (2):179-186.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads284 ( #1,814 of 1,679,369 )
Recent downloads (6 months)41 ( #3,335 of 1,679,369 )
How can I increase my downloads?