Depiction and convention

Dialectica 62 (3):335-348 (2008)
Abstract
By defining both depictive and linguistic representation as kinds of symbol system, Nelson Goodman attempts to undermine the platitude that, whereas linguistic representation is mediated by convention, depiction is mediated by resemblance. I argue that Goodman is right to draw a strong analogy between the two kinds of representation, but wrong to draw the counterintuitive conclusion that depiction is not mediated by resemblance.
Keywords Depiction  Convention  Symbol Systems  Nelson Goodman  David Lewis
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1746-8361.2008.01156.x
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive Ben Blumson, Depiction and convention
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
David Lewis (1975). Languages and Language. In Keith Gunderson (ed.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science. University of Minnesota Press 3-35.

View all 15 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Ben Blumson (2012). Mental Maps. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 85 (2):413-434.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

137 ( #26,988 of 1,796,258 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

23 ( #32,405 of 1,796,258 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.