Metaphilosophy 41 (4):582-617 (2010)
|Abstract||Abstract: Forgiveness of wrongdoing in response to public apology and amends making seems, on the face of it, to leave little room for the continued commemoration of wrongdoing. This rests on a misunderstanding of forgiveness, however, and we can explain why there need be no incompatibility between them. To do this, I emphasize the role of what I call nonangry negative moral emotions in constituting memories of wrongdoing. Memories so constituted can persist after forgiveness and have important moral functions, and commemorations can elicit these emotions to preserve memories of this sort. Moreover, commemorations can be a restorative justice practice that promotes reconciliation, but only on condition that the memories they preserve are constituted by nonangry negative, not retributive, emotions.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Albert W. Dzur & Alan Wertheimer (2002). Forgiveness and Public Deliberation: The Practice of Restorative Justice. Criminal Justice Ethics 21 (1):3-20.
Michele Moody-Adams (forthcoming). Reply to Griswold, Forgiveness: A Philosophical Exploration. Philosophia.
Zenon Szablowinski (2011). Apology with and Without a Request for Forgiveness. Heythrop Journal 53 (5):731-741.
Linda Radzik (2009). Making Amends: Atonement in Morality, Law, and Politics. Oxford University Press.
Margaret R. Holmgren (2012). Forgiveness and Retribution: Responding to Wrongdoing. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2010-07-22
Total downloads47 ( #23,056 of 548,984 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,327 of 548,984 )
How can I increase my downloads?