Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Philosophical Research 35:123-128 (2010)
|Abstract||It's possible to understand an infinite number of novel maps. I argue that Roberto Casati and Achille Varzi's compositional semantics of maps cannot explain this possibility, because it requires an infinite number of semantic primitives. So the semantics of maps is puzzlingly different from the semantics of language.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Meena Kharatmal & Nagarjuna G. (2006). A Proposal to Refine Concept Mapping for Effective Science Learning. In A. J. Canas & J. D. Novak (eds.), Concept Maps: Theory, Methodology, Technology Proc. of the Second Int. Conference on Concept Mapping.
Sergio Sismondo & Nicholas Chrisman (2001). Deflationary Metaphysics and the Natures of Maps. Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 2001 (3):S38-.
Paul Bankston (1999). A Hierarchy of Maps Between Compacta. Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (4):1628-1644.
Michael Rescorla (2009). Predication and Cartographic Representation. Synthese 169 (1):175 - 200.
Added to index2009-01-30
Total downloads38 ( #35,874 of 739,406 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,044 of 739,406 )
How can I increase my downloads?